SLM vs. LULU
SLM (SLM Corporation) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. SLM operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while LULU operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, SLM returned 15.49%/yr vs 4.44%/yr for LULU. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SLM vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLM achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -42.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SLM has outperformed LULU with an annualized return of 15.49%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively lower 4.44% annualized return.
SLM
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- -14.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.31%
LULU
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- -31.88%
- YTD
- -42.80%
- 1Y
- -38.51%
- 3Y*
- -32.19%
- 5Y*
- -21.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $288.12M | $294.91M | $421.96M | |
| $82.75M | $78.72M | $65.04M |
SLM vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLM SLM Corporation | -2.71% | -0.20% | 47.25% | 18.70% | -13.47% | 60.54% | 40.89% | 8.60% | -26.46% | 2.54% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -42.80% | -45.66% | -25.21% | 59.59% | -18.16% | 12.48% | 50.23% | 90.50% | 54.74% | 20.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLM and LULU is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
SLM:
$4.89B
LULU:
$13.50B
SLM:
$3.66
LULU:
$12.35
SLM:
7.11
LULU:
9.63
SLM:
1.08
LULU:
0.47
SLM:
1.73
LULU:
1.25
SLM:
1.98
LULU:
2.73
SLM:
$3.00B
LULU:
$11.20B
SLM:
$1.91B
LULU:
$6.24B
SLM:
$1.22B
LULU:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLM vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank
SLM
LULU
SLM vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLM Corporation (SLM) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLM | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.85 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | -0.80 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | -1.51 | +0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLM vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLM drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, roughly equal to the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLM and LULU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLM | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -92.26% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.88% | -51.16% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.06% | -79.38% | +34.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.06% | -79.38% | +34.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.79% | -79.38% | +27.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.81% | -76.75% | +53.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.88% | -27.95% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.10% | 26.95% | -2.85% |
Volatility
SLM vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
SLM Corporation (SLM) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 8.86%. This indicates that SLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLM | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.85% | 8.86% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.48% | 31.60% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.30% | 45.09% | -5.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.88% | 42.51% | -6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.78% | 40.80% | -4.02% |
Dividends
SLM vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
SLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLM SLM Corporation | 2.00% | 1.92% | 1.67% | 2.30% | 2.65% | 1.02% | 0.97% | 1.35% |
Financials
SLM vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SLM Corporation and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLM vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison
SLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SLM Corporation reported a gross profit of 501.80M and revenue of 602.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
SLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SLM Corporation reported an operating income of 307.51M and revenue of 602.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.1%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
SLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SLM Corporation reported a net income of 54.94M and revenue of 602.06M, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLM and LULU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLM has higher volatility (9.85%) compared to LULU (8.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLM dropped -94.50% vs LULU's -92.26%.
SLM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.42 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLM and LULU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer