PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLM vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SLM vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SLM Corporation (SLM) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SLM vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SLM
SLM Corporation
-20.35%-0.20%47.25%18.70%-13.47%60.54%40.37%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-5.92%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLM achieves a -20.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's -5.92% return.


SLM

1D
3.73%
1M
15.01%
YTD
-20.35%
6M
-21.80%
1Y
-25.69%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
14.24%

QQQM

1D
3.37%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
23.76%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLM vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLM
SLM Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLM Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLM Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLM vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLM Corporation (SLM) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLMQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

1.06

-1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.64

1.65

-2.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.24

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

1.89

-2.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.23

6.96

-8.19

SLM vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLM Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLM and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLMQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

1.06

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.59

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.63

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between SLM and QQQM is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SLM vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

SLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
SLM
SLM Corporation
2.43%1.92%1.67%2.30%2.65%1.02%0.97%1.35%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%

Drawdowns

SLM vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLM drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLM and QQQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SLMQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.50%

-35.04%

-59.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.06%

-12.55%

-32.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.06%

-35.04%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.85%

-8.99%

-44.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.40%

-8.47%

-32.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.91%

3.41%

+16.50%

Volatility

SLM vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

SLM Corporation (SLM) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 6.48%. This indicates that SLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SLMQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.85%

6.48%

+3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.10%

12.73%

+20.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.68%

22.42%

+18.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.81%

22.25%

+13.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.92%

22.27%

+14.65%