PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEGR vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEGR vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return.


LEGR

1D
-1.50%
1M
7.23%
YTD
12.39%
6M
15.64%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
23.83%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEGR vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
12.39%30.83%16.25%22.79%-19.01%17.91%18.73%27.99%-14.11%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-7.98%

Correlation

The correlation between LEGR and FDL is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between LEGR and FDL has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LEGR vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LEGR
FDL

Financial Services

42.5%
15.1%

Technology

27.3%
1.1%

Communication Services

8.9%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
3.8%

Industrials

5.6%
3.8%

Utilities

2.1%
6.5%

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
14.7%

Healthcare

1.3%
16.8%

Energy

0.8%
27.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

LEGR
42.5%
FDL
15.1%

Technology

LEGR
27.3%
FDL
1.1%

Communication Services

LEGR
8.9%
FDL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

LEGR
8.5%
FDL
3.8%

Industrials

LEGR
5.6%
FDL
3.8%

Utilities

LEGR
2.1%
FDL
6.5%

Basic Materials

LEGR
1.6%
FDL
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

LEGR
1.4%
FDL
14.7%

Healthcare

LEGR
1.3%
FDL
16.8%

Energy

LEGR
0.8%
FDL
27.3%

Real Estate

LEGR

-

FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEGR vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEGR
LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEGR vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEGRFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

5.56

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

13.56

-2.35

LEGR vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEGR Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEGR and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEGRFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.11

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.88

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.45

+0.15

Drawdowns

LEGR vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEGRFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-65.93%

+29.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-4.27%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

-12.24%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

-16.46%

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-2.18%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-9.66%

+3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

1.75%

+0.99%

Volatility

LEGR vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that LEGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEGRFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

2.85%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

7.87%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

11.28%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

14.31%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

17.11%

+3.20%

LEGR vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEGR vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
1.67%1.84%2.40%2.56%2.64%1.80%0.95%2.04%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEGR and FDL have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEGR has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 12.51% vs 11.82% for LEGR. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.67% for LEGR.

LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.45% for FDL.

LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEGR and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer