PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEGR vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEGR vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 16.21% return.


LEGR

1D
-1.50%
1M
7.23%
YTD
12.39%
6M
15.64%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
23.83%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*

BLOK

1D
-2.62%
1M
7.72%
YTD
16.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
30.79%
3Y*
51.34%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEGR vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
12.39%30.83%16.25%22.79%-19.01%17.91%18.73%27.99%-14.11%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
16.21%32.64%53.12%99.62%-62.36%30.76%90.17%29.54%-28.41%

Correlation

The correlation between LEGR and BLOK is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018

0.68

The correlation between LEGR and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

LEGR vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LEGR
BLOK

Financial Services

42.5%
55.3%

Technology

27.3%
31.8%

Communication Services

8.9%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
6.7%

Industrials

5.6%
1.0%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.4%

-

Healthcare

1.3%

-

Energy

0.8%

-

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Financial Services

LEGR
42.5%
BLOK
55.3%

Technology

LEGR
27.3%
BLOK
31.8%

Communication Services

LEGR
8.9%
BLOK
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

LEGR
8.5%
BLOK
6.7%

Industrials

LEGR
5.6%
BLOK
1.0%

Utilities

LEGR
2.1%
BLOK

-

Basic Materials

LEGR
1.6%
BLOK

-

Consumer Defensive

LEGR
1.4%
BLOK

-

Healthcare

LEGR
1.3%
BLOK

-

Energy

LEGR
0.8%
BLOK

-

Real Estate

LEGR

-

BLOK
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEGR vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEGR
LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEGR vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEGRBLOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.16

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

0.87

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

1.90

+9.31

LEGR vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEGR Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEGR and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEGRBLOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

0.81

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.28

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.48

+0.12

Drawdowns

LEGR vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and BLOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEGRBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-73.33%

+37.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-35.64%

+25.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

-35.64%

+21.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

-73.33%

+41.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-10.16%

+8.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-26.08%

+19.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

16.23%

-13.49%

Volatility

LEGR vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) is 4.93%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that LEGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEGRBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

10.59%

-5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

28.55%

-17.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

38.29%

-24.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

42.36%

-25.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

38.97%

-18.66%

LEGR vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEGR vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than BLOK's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
0.62%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
1.67%1.84%2.40%2.56%2.64%1.80%0.95%2.04%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEGR and BLOK have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to LEGR (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

On 5-year performance, BLOK leads with 11.96% vs 11.82% for LEGR. On fees, LEGR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 11.96% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LEGR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.

LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.

LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while BLOK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.71% for BLOK.

LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEGR and BLOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer