LEGR vs. BLOK
LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEGR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index, while BLOK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. LEGR is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEGR returned 11.82%/yr vs 11.96%/yr for BLOK. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for BLOK.
Performance
LEGR vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 16.21% return.
LEGR
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 15.64%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 51.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
LEGR vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 12.39% | 30.83% | 16.25% | 22.79% | -19.01% | 17.91% | 18.73% | 27.99% | -14.11% |
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 16.21% | 32.64% | 53.12% | 99.62% | -62.36% | 30.76% | 90.17% | 29.54% | -28.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEGR and BLOK is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018 | 0.68 |
The correlation between LEGR and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
LEGR vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEGR
BLOK
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
LEGR
BLOK
Technology
LEGR
BLOK
Communication Services
LEGR
BLOK
Consumer Cyclical
LEGR
BLOK
Industrials
LEGR
BLOK
Utilities
LEGR
BLOK
-
Basic Materials
LEGR
BLOK
-
Consumer Defensive
LEGR
BLOK
-
Healthcare
LEGR
BLOK
-
Energy
LEGR
BLOK
-
Real Estate
LEGR
-
BLOK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEGR vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank
LEGR
BLOK
LEGR vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEGR | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.16 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 0.87 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.21 | 1.90 | +9.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEGR | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 0.81 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.28 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.48 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
LEGR vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and BLOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEGR | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -73.33% | +37.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -35.64% | +25.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.25% | -35.64% | +21.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | -73.33% | +41.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -10.16% | +8.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -26.08% | +19.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 16.23% | -13.49% |
Volatility
LEGR vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) is 4.93%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that LEGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEGR | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 10.59% | -5.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 28.55% | -17.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 38.29% | -24.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 42.36% | -25.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 38.97% | -18.66% |
LEGR vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEGR vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison
LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than BLOK's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 0.62% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 1.67% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEGR and BLOK have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to LEGR (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs BLOK's -73.33%.
On 5-year performance, BLOK leads with 11.96% vs 11.82% for LEGR. On fees, LEGR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 11.96% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LEGR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.
LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.
LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while BLOK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.71% for BLOK.
LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEGR and BLOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer