PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEGR vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEGR vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.22% return.


LEGR

1D
0.10%
1M
2.17%
6M
6.41%
YTD
11.04%
1Y
26.44%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.72%

IBIT

1D
-2.89%
1M
2.21%
6M
-24.95%
YTD
-28.22%
1Y
-44.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.30B$1.34B$1.68B
$161.15K$131.30K$172.81K

LEGR vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
11.04%30.83%17.83%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-28.22%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between LEGR and IBIT is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEGR vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LEGR
LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LEGR vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEGRIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.83

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

-0.87

+3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

-1.34

+9.09

LEGR vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEGR Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEGR and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEGR vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEGRIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-53.30%

+17.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-53.30%

+42.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-50.01%

+47.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-18.24%

+11.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

34.66%

-31.49%

Volatility

LEGR vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) is 4.38%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that LEGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEGRIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

9.21%

-4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

33.74%

-21.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

44.46%

-29.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

49.60%

-32.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

49.60%

-29.34%

LEGR vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEGR vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
1.80%1.84%2.40%2.56%2.64%1.80%0.95%2.04%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEGR and IBIT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to LEGR (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

On 1-year performance, LEGR leads with 26.44% vs -44.50% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 26.44% return vs -44.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.

LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.25% for IBIT.

LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEGR and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer