LEG vs. CL
LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LEG returned -12.01%/yr vs 4.44%/yr for CL. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LEG vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a -10.05% return, which is significantly lower than CL's 17.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed CL with an annualized return of -12.01%, while CL has yielded a comparatively higher 4.44% annualized return.
LEG
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -16.02%
- 6M
- -15.21%
- YTD
- -10.05%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- -29.16%
- 5Y*
- -24.27%
- 10Y*
- -12.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.33%
CL
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 11.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $438.38M | $416.63M | $459.32M | |
| $18.50M | $23.27M | $28.03M |
LEG vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -10.05% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 17.64% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEG and CL is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
LEG:
$1.34B
CL:
$73.06B
LEG:
$1.60
CL:
$2.53
LEG:
6.13
CL:
36.15
LEG:
0.45
CL:
3.50
LEG:
1.33
CL:
311.74
LEG:
$3.03B
CL:
$21.05B
LEG:
$717.40M
CL:
$12.72B
LEG:
$433.10M
CL:
$3.68B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEG vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
LEG
CL
LEG vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEG | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.10 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.69 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 1.37 | -1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEG vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEG | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.41% | -58.91% | -27.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.51% | -16.97% | -11.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.68% | -29.05% | -47.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.29% | -29.05% | -55.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.41% | -29.05% | -57.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.20% | -12.03% | -67.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.84% | -11.24% | -8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.72% | 8.47% | +5.25% |
Volatility
LEG vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 7.62%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEG | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.32% | 7.62% | +3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.38% | 17.78% | +14.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.36% | 22.53% | +26.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.74% | 18.97% | +23.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.96% | 19.87% | +20.09% |
Dividends
LEG vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than CL's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.30% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 2.04% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
LEG vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LEG and CL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to CL (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs CL's -58.91%.
CL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEG and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer