PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEG vs. VZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LEG vs. VZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than VZ's 18.48% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed VZ with an annualized return of -10.62%, while VZ has yielded a comparatively higher 3.86% annualized return.


LEG

1D
2.44%
1M
9.83%
YTD
0.23%
6M
1.53%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
-25.16%
5Y*
-23.55%
10Y*
-10.62%

VZ

1D
3.02%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
18.48%
6M
20.88%
1Y
17.75%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
3.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEG vs. VZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
0.23%17.02%-61.93%-13.45%-17.78%-3.76%-9.05%47.13%-22.25%0.58%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
18.48%8.86%13.14%2.71%-20.02%-7.55%-0.13%13.83%11.26%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between LEG and VZ is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2000

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between LEG and VZ has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEG:

$1.54B

VZ:

$196.73B

EPS

LEG:

$1.60

VZ:

$4.10

PE Ratio

LEG:

6.82

VZ:

11.39

PS Ratio

LEG:

0.51

VZ:

1.42

PB Ratio

LEG:

1.48

VZ:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEG:

$3.03B

VZ:

$139.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEG:

$717.40M

VZ:

$81.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

LEG:

$433.10M

VZ:

$48.65B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEG vs. VZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEG
LEG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEG vs. VZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEGVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.17

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

1.34

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.43

2.80

-1.36

LEG vs. VZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEG Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the VZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEG and VZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEG vs. VZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than VZ's maximum drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and VZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEGVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.41%

-50.66%

-35.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.51%

-13.32%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.78%

-14.93%

-61.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.96%

-38.38%

-46.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.41%

-41.21%

-45.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.82%

-7.68%

-69.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.69%

-14.82%

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.95%

6.36%

+7.59%

Volatility

LEG vs. VZ - Volatility Comparison

Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 10.73% compared to Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) at 7.62%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEGVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.73%

7.62%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.46%

18.34%

+13.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.69%

23.06%

+26.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.52%

21.75%

+20.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.84%

20.41%

+19.43%

Dividends

LEG vs. VZ - Dividend Comparison

LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than VZ's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
1.83%1.82%6.35%6.95%5.40%4.03%3.61%3.11%4.19%2.98%2.74%3.00%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
5.92%6.68%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.85%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%

Financials

LEG vs. VZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and Verizon Communications Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B202220232024202520260
34.44B
(LEG) Total Revenue
(VZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LEG and VZ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEG has higher volatility (10.73%) compared to VZ (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs VZ's -50.66%.

VZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEG and VZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer