LEAD vs. SYLD
LEAD (Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF) and SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEAD is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index, while SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. LEAD is passively managed, while SYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, LEAD returned 14.95%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for SYLD. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEAD charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SYLD.
Performance
LEAD vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEAD achieves a 16.18% return, which is significantly lower than SYLD's 17.19% return. Over the past 10 years, LEAD has outperformed SYLD with an annualized return of 14.95%, while SYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.58% annualized return.
LEAD
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 16.18%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
SYLD
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
LEAD vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF | 16.18% | 15.52% | 10.32% | 26.25% | -18.16% | 29.69% | 23.41% | 33.75% | -6.63% | 24.89% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 17.19% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEAD and SYLD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2016 | 0.71 |
The correlation between LEAD and SYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LEAD vs. SYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEAD
SYLD
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
LEAD
SYLD
Industrials
LEAD
SYLD
Financial Services
LEAD
SYLD
Healthcare
LEAD
SYLD
Consumer Defensive
LEAD
SYLD
Consumer Cyclical
LEAD
SYLD
Energy
LEAD
SYLD
Communication Services
LEAD
SYLD
Basic Materials
LEAD
-
SYLD
Real Estate
LEAD
-
SYLD
-
Utilities
LEAD
-
SYLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEAD vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank
LEAD
SYLD
LEAD vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEAD | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 4.07 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 11.04 | +1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEAD vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEAD drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, smaller than the maximum SYLD drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD and SYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEAD | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.19% | -45.36% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | -6.93% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.86% | -26.62% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -26.62% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.19% | -45.36% | +13.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -5.65% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 2.55% | -0.50% |
Volatility
LEAD vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) at 3.35%. This indicates that LEAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEAD | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 3.35% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.26% | 9.75% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 15.59% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 20.61% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 22.95% | -4.25% |
LEAD vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEAD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than SYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEAD vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison
LEAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than SYLD's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF | 0.57% | 0.70% | 0.93% | 1.13% | 1.27% | 1.79% | 0.81% | 1.32% | 1.38% | 0.97% | 1.38% | 0.00% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.81% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEAD and SYLD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEAD has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to SYLD (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEAD dropped -32.19% vs SYLD's -45.36%.
On 10-year performance, LEAD leads with 14.95% vs 13.58% for SYLD. On fees, LEAD is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LEAD has performed better with a 14.95% return vs 13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LEAD is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SYLD.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.57% for LEAD.
LEAD is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SYLD is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for LEAD and 0.59% for SYLD.
SYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEAD and SYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer