PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LEAD vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LEAD vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LEAD (Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - LEAD is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LEAD returned 14.71%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LEAD charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

LEAD vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEAD achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Over the past 10 years, LEAD has outperformed BNO with an annualized return of 14.71%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.60% annualized return.

LEAD

1D
0.48%
1M
4.84%
YTD
15.75%
6M
14.25%
1Y
25.56%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
14.71%

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEAD vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEAD
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF		15.75%15.52%10.32%26.25%-18.16%29.69%23.41%33.75%-6.63%24.89%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between LEAD and BNO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2016

0.14

The correlation between LEAD and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.14 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF

United States Brent Oil Fund LP

Often compared with LEAD:
LEAD vs. SPYLEAD vs. VIGLEAD vs. SCHDLEAD vs. DSTLLEAD vs. DGROLEAD vs. VOOLEAD vs. TDIV
Often compared with BNO:
BNO vs. USOBNO vs. XLEBNO vs. USLBNO vs. BOILBNO vs. UNGBNO vs. UCOBNO vs. XOM

Return for Risk

LEAD vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LEAD
LEAD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LEAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEAD Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LEAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEAD Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEAD vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LEADBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.77
2.23

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.47
2.73

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

5.17

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

9.76

+2.90

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LEAD vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEAD and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LEADBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.23

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.69

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.37

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.14

+0.66

Drawdowns

LEAD vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEAD drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD and BNO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LEADBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.19%

-87.06%

+54.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-17.87%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.86%

-23.75%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-33.70%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.19%

-75.18%

+42.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.29%

+10.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-40.17%

+35.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

9.45%

-7.43%

Volatility

LEAD vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) is 4.12%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that LEAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LEADBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

14.22%

-10.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.33%

36.10%

-24.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.56%

41.46%

-26.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

35.38%

-18.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

36.68%

-18.03%

LEAD vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEAD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

LEAD vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

LEAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LEAD
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF		0.58%0.70%0.93%1.13%1.27%1.79%0.81%1.32%1.38%0.97%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

LEAD and BNO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to LEAD (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEAD dropped -32.19% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, LEAD leads with 14.71% vs 13.60% for BNO. On fees, LEAD is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, LEAD has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, LEAD has performed better with a 14.71% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LEAD is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

LEAD has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

LEAD is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. LEAD tracks Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for LEAD and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEAD and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer