PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNO vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNO vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNO vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.72%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
79.42%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BNO having a 77.72% return and USO slightly higher at 79.42%. Over the past 10 years, BNO has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 15.62%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.22% annualized return.


BNO

1D
-3.23%
1M
34.79%
YTD
77.72%
6M
69.06%
1Y
62.25%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
25.28%
10Y*
15.62%

USO

1D
-2.48%
1M
42.32%
YTD
79.42%
6M
69.66%
1Y
60.99%
3Y*
23.15%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
5.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNO vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNO vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNO vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNOUSODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

1.56

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

2.22

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.97

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.02

5.14

+0.89

BNO vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNO Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNO and USO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNOUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.56

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.71

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.14

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

-0.19

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between BNO and USO is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BNO vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNO nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BNO vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNO drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNO and USO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNOUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.06%

-98.19%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.48%

-20.39%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

-36.23%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

-86.75%

+11.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-86.80%

+80.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.52%

-75.21%

+34.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.26%

11.77%

-1.51%

Volatility

BNO vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) is 20.48%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 22.21%. This indicates that BNO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNOUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.48%

22.21%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.96%

29.81%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.84%

39.35%

-2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.91%

34.40%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.11%

38.33%

-2.22%