Correlation
The correlation between BNO and UNG is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
BNO vs. UNG
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG).
BNO and UNG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BNO is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. It was launched on Jun 2, 2010. UNG is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Natural Gas. It was launched on Apr 18, 2007. Both BNO and UNG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BNO or UNG.
Performance
BNO vs. UNG - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
BNO:
-0.32
UNG:
-0.27
BNO:
-0.36
UNG:
0.10
BNO:
0.96
UNG:
1.01
BNO:
-0.24
UNG:
-0.14
BNO:
-1.00
UNG:
-0.50
BNO:
10.90%
UNG:
27.10%
BNO:
28.59%
UNG:
61.60%
BNO:
-87.06%
UNG:
-99.85%
BNO:
-40.71%
UNG:
-99.79%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNO achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly lower than UNG's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BNO has outperformed UNG with an annualized return of 1.83%, while UNG has yielded a comparatively lower -22.71% annualized return.
BNO
-8.05%
-1.29%
-5.26%
-10.03%
-5.28%
24.20%
1.83%
UNG
0.12%
7.20%
13.79%
-11.51%
-48.11%
-18.41%
-22.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BNO vs. UNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than UNG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BNO vs. UNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BNO
UNG
BNO vs. UNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
BNO vs. UNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BNO nor UNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BNO vs. UNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNO drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, smaller than the maximum UNG drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNO and UNG.
Loading data...
Volatility
BNO vs. UNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) is 8.66%, while United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a volatility of 17.63%. This indicates that BNO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...