LEAD vs. BLCN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LEAD (Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF) and BLCN (Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEAD is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index, while BLCN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEAD returned 12.16%/yr vs -9.77%/yr for BLCN. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEAD charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BLCN.

Performance

LEAD vs. BLCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEAD achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than BLCN's 13.09% return.

LEAD

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 15.75%
• 6M: 14.25%
• 1Y: 25.56%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: 14.71%

BLCN

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 10.42%
• YTD: 13.09%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: 27.10%
• 3Y*: 9.50%
• 5Y*: -9.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEAD vs. BLCN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF	15.75%	15.52%	10.32%	26.25%	-18.16%	29.69%	23.41%	33.75%	-11.06%
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF	13.09%	-3.69%	5.62%	21.09%	-51.76%	4.86%	60.60%	33.94%	-19.15%

Correlation

The correlation between LEAD and BLCN is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between LEAD and BLCN has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LEAD vs. BLCN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LEAD	BLCN
Technology	36.5%	57.1%
Industrials	31.1%	16.0%
Financial Services	16.2%	7.3%
Healthcare	5.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.3%	4.4%
Energy	1.3%	-
Communication Services	0.1%	3.5%
Basic Materials	-	4.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	4.2%

Return for Risk

LEAD vs. BLCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEAD

LEAD Risk / Return Rank: 56
LEAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LEAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LEAD Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LEAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
LEAD Martin Ratio Rank: 69

BLCN

BLCN Risk / Return Rank: 21
BLCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BLCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BLCN Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BLCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BLCN Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEAD vs. BLCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LEAD	BLCN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	0.76	+1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	1.25	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.15	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	0.92	+2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.66	1.97	+10.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LEAD vs. BLCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the BLCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEAD and BLCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LEAD	BLCN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.77	0.76	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	-0.28	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.08	+0.72

Drawdowns

LEAD vs. BLCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEAD drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, smaller than the maximum BLCN drawdown of -67.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD and BLCN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEAD	BLCN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.19%	-67.51%	+35.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-29.53%	+20.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.86%	-45.26%	+27.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.93%	-67.51%	+42.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-45.11%	+45.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-30.29%	+25.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	13.82%	-11.80%

Volatility

LEAD vs. BLCN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) is 4.12%, while Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that LEAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEAD	BLCN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	14.45%	-10.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.33%	29.11%	-17.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.56%	36.03%	-21.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.34%	34.93%	-17.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.65%	31.22%	-12.57%

LEAD vs. BLCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEAD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCN's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

LEAD vs. BLCN - Dividend Comparison

LEAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than BLCN's 2.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF	2.66%	3.01%	0.67%	0.54%	1.28%	0.56%	0.58%	1.45%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF	0.58%	0.70%	0.93%	1.13%	1.27%	1.79%	0.81%	1.32%	1.38%	0.97%	1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEAD and BLCN in my portfolio?

LEAD and BLCN have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LEAD or BLCN?

BLCN has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to LEAD (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEAD dropped -32.19% vs BLCN's -67.51%.

Which ETF is better, LEAD or BLCN?

On 5-year performance, LEAD leads with 12.16% vs -9.77% for BLCN. On fees, LEAD is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, LEAD has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LEAD or BLCN?

Over the 5-year period, LEAD has performed better with a 12.16% return vs -9.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LEAD or BLCN?

LEAD is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BLCN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LEAD or BLCN?

BLCN has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.58% for LEAD.

What is the main difference between LEAD and BLCN?

LEAD is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BLCN is Large Cap Blend Equities. LEAD tracks Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index, while BLCN tracks Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for LEAD and 0.68% for BLCN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LEAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.