BLCN vs. FINX
BLCN (Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF) and FINX (Global X FinTech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index, while FINX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global FinTech Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLCN returned -9.77%/yr vs -10.20%/yr for FINX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.
Performance
BLCN vs. FINX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLCN achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than FINX's -16.28% return.
BLCN
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 10.42%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- -9.77%
- 10Y*
- —
FINX
- 1D
- -4.72%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- -16.28%
- 6M
- -18.85%
- 1Y
- -20.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.77%
- 5Y*
- -10.20%
- 10Y*
- —
BLCN vs. FINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF | 13.09% | -3.69% | 5.62% | 21.09% | -51.76% | 4.86% | 60.60% | 33.94% | -19.15% |
FINX Global X FinTech ETF | -16.28% | -5.20% | 23.02% | 33.15% | -51.80% | -9.65% | 53.76% | 37.52% | -6.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLCN and FINX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BLCN and FINX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BLCN vs. FINX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLCN
FINX
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
BLCN
FINX
Industrials
BLCN
FINX
Financial Services
BLCN
FINX
Consumer Cyclical
BLCN
FINX
-
Basic Materials
BLCN
FINX
-
Utilities
BLCN
FINX
-
Communication Services
BLCN
FINX
-
Consumer Defensive
BLCN
-
FINX
-
Energy
BLCN
-
FINX
-
Healthcare
BLCN
-
FINX
Real Estate
BLCN
-
FINX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLCN vs. FINX — Risk / Return Rank
BLCN
FINX
BLCN vs. FINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) and Global X FinTech ETF (FINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLCN | FINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | -0.70 | +1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | -0.83 | +2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.90 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | -0.56 | +1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.97 | -1.09 | +3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLCN | FINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | -0.70 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | -0.33 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.21 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
BLCN vs. FINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLCN drawdown since its inception was -67.51%, which is greater than FINX's maximum drawdown of -63.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCN and FINX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLCN | FINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.51% | -63.53% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.53% | -36.58% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.26% | -36.58% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.51% | -63.53% | -3.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.11% | -49.93% | +4.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.29% | -24.45% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.82% | 18.98% | -5.16% |
Volatility
BLCN vs. FINX - Volatility Comparison
Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) has a higher volatility of 14.45% compared to Global X FinTech ETF (FINX) at 8.15%. This indicates that BLCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLCN | FINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.45% | 8.15% | +6.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.11% | 22.78% | +6.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.03% | 29.36% | +6.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.93% | 31.40% | +3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.22% | 28.73% | +2.49% |
BLCN vs. FINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BLCN and FINX have an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Dividends
BLCN vs. FINX - Dividend Comparison
BLCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than FINX's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF | 2.66% | 3.01% | 0.67% | 0.54% | 1.28% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 1.45% | 1.16% | 0.00% |
FINX Global X FinTech ETF | 0.69% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 0.21% | 0.27% | 5.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLCN and FINX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLCN has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to FINX (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCN dropped -67.51% vs FINX's -63.53%.
On 5-year performance, BLCN leads with -9.77% vs -10.20% for FINX. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, FINX has been the lower-risk option at 8.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLCN has performed better with a -9.77% return vs -10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLCN and FINX have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.
BLCN has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.69% for FINX.
BLCN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FINX is Technology Equities. BLCN tracks Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index, while FINX tracks Indxx Global FinTech Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Global X.
BLCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLCN and FINX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer