PortfoliosLab logo
BLCN vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BLCN and COST is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BLCN vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.67%
483.27%
BLCN
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLCN:

-0.41

COST:

1.50

Sortino Ratio

BLCN:

-0.34

COST:

2.09

Omega Ratio

BLCN:

0.96

COST:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

BLCN:

-0.27

COST:

1.96

Martin Ratio

BLCN:

-1.02

COST:

5.76

Ulcer Index

BLCN:

17.96%

COST:

5.88%

Daily Std Dev

BLCN:

44.00%

COST:

21.94%

Max Drawdown

BLCN:

-67.51%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

BLCN:

-58.65%

COST:

-6.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCN achieves a -17.94% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 10.24% return.


BLCN

YTD

-17.94%

1M

27.28%

6M

-21.78%

1Y

-17.75%

5Y*

-2.82%

10Y*

N/A

COST

YTD

10.24%

1M

11.03%

6M

10.53%

1Y

32.68%

5Y*

29.14%

10Y*

23.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLCN vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLCN is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLCN is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLCN is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLCN is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLCN is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLCN is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLCN vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BLCN Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCN and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.41
1.50
BLCN
COST

Dividends

BLCN vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

BLCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than COST's 0.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BLCN
Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF
0.60%0.67%0.54%1.28%0.56%0.58%1.45%1.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.47%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

BLCN vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCN drawdown since its inception was -67.51%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCN and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-58.65%
-6.30%
BLCN
COST

Volatility

BLCN vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) has a higher volatility of 17.81% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 8.28%. This indicates that BLCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
17.81%
8.28%
BLCN
COST