LCTU vs. RLY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LCTU (BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTU is a ESG fund actively managed by BlackRock, while RLY is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCTU returned 12.37%/yr vs 10.43%/yr for RLY. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCTU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.

Performance

LCTU vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTU achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 17.13% return.

LCTU

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 9.04%
• 6M: 9.21%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: 21.17%
• 5Y*: 12.37%
• 10Y*: —

RLY

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 17.13%
• 6M: 18.27%
• 1Y: 31.78%
• 3Y*: 15.11%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: 8.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTU vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	9.04%	16.96%	24.00%	25.38%	-20.02%	17.49%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	17.13%	20.26%	2.53%	2.56%	7.86%	12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTU and RLY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between LCTU and RLY has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LCTU vs. RLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LCTU	RLY
Technology	34.6%	-
Financial Services	12.1%	0.0%
Communication Services	10.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	2.6%
Healthcare	8.8%	0.8%
Industrials	8.7%	16.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.6%
Energy	3.5%	30.1%
Real Estate	2.5%	5.4%
Utilities	2.5%	15.9%
Basic Materials	1.9%	25.1%

Return for Risk

LCTU vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTU

LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 61
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 62
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 67

RLY

RLY Risk / Return Rank: 92
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 90
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTU vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCTU	RLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	3.17	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	4.33	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.60	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	8.60	-5.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.25	31.17	-18.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCTU vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTU Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTU and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCTU	RLY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	3.17	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.77	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.38	+0.38

Drawdowns

LCTU vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, smaller than the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and RLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCTU	RLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.93%	-37.75%	+11.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.38%	-3.71%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.83%	-10.08%	-9.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.93%	-18.94%	-6.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-1.60%	+0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.32%	-9.46%	+3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	1.02%	+1.09%

Volatility

LCTU vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) have volatilities of 3.04% and 3.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCTU	RLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	3.00%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.36%	8.15%	+1.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.30%	10.06%	+2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.15%	13.54%	+3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.02%	13.81%	+3.21%

LCTU vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCTU vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than RLY's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	0.93%	1.02%	1.27%	1.46%	1.63%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	2.86%	3.24%	3.31%	3.71%	5.66%	12.15%	2.16%	3.45%	2.76%	1.85%	2.07%	1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCTU and RLY in my portfolio?

LCTU and RLY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCTU or RLY?

LCTU has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to RLY (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTU dropped -25.93% vs RLY's -37.75%.

Which ETF is better, LCTU or RLY?

On 5-year performance, LCTU leads with 12.37% vs 10.43% for RLY. On fees, LCTU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCTU or RLY?

Over the 5-year period, LCTU has performed better with a 12.37% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCTU or RLY?

LCTU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCTU or RLY?

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.93% for LCTU.

What is the main difference between LCTU and RLY?

LCTU is categorized as ESG, while RLY is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LCTU and 0.50% for RLY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.