RLY vs. AOA
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA).
RLY and AOA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RLY is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 25, 2012. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RLY or AOA.
Key characteristics
| RLY | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.99% | 2.74% |
| 1Y Return | 5.65% | 13.69% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.07% | 2.91% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.53% | 7.48% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.83% | 7.08% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.37 | 1.33 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.32% | 9.67% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.74% | -28.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.49% | -3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLY and AOA is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RLY vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RLY achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than AOA's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RLY has underperformed AOA with an annualized return of 2.83%, while AOA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.08% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RLY vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RLY vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RLY vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than AOA's 2.20% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 3.38% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 2.15% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.20% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
RLY vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.74%, which is greater than AOA's maximum drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and AOA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RLY vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) have volatilities of 2.96% and 3.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.