RLY vs. SECT
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT).
RLY and SECT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RLY is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 25, 2012. SECT is an actively managed fund by Main Management. It was launched on Sep 5, 2017.
Performance
RLY vs. SECT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RLY vs. SECT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 15.06% | 20.26% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 7.86% | 22.85% | -0.59% | 15.63% | -11.72% | 6.02% |
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF | -6.08% | 17.80% | 18.61% | 21.10% | -12.80% | 28.88% | 15.65% | 28.06% | -9.66% | 9.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLY achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly higher than SECT's -6.08% return.
RLY
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 15.06%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 31.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
SECT
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -5.64%
- YTD
- -6.08%
- 6M
- -3.67%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RLY vs. SECT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SECT's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RLY vs. SECT — Risk / Return Rank
RLY
SECT
RLY vs. SECT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RLY | SECT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.36 | 0.96 | +1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.06 | 1.50 | +1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.23 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 1.54 | +1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.77 | 6.37 | +12.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RLY | SECT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 0.96 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.56 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.59 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between RLY and SECT is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RLY vs. SECT - Dividend Comparison
RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than SECT's 0.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 2.91% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF | 0.71% | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.84% | 0.86% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 0.77% | 1.67% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RLY vs. SECT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, roughly equal to the maximum SECT drawdown of -38.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and SECT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLY | SECT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.75% | -38.09% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.94% | -12.44% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.94% | -21.71% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -8.03% | +7.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -4.72% | -4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 3.01% | -1.33% |
Volatility
RLY vs. SECT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) is 3.54%, while Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that RLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SECT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RLY | SECT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 5.49% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 10.25% | -1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 19.93% | -6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 17.81% | -4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 20.25% | -6.43% |