LCTU vs. FSST
LCTU (BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and FSST (Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTU is a ESG fund actively managed by BlackRock, while FSST is a Sustainable fund tracking the Russell 3000. LCTU is actively managed, while FSST is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCTU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FSST.
Performance
LCTU vs. FSST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCTU
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
FSST
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCTU vs. FSST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 6.58% | 16.96% | 24.00% | 25.38% | -20.02% | 12.88% |
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 15.40% | 21.40% | 25.49% | -18.30% | 12.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCTU and FSST is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LCTU and FSST has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
LCTU vs. FSST - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCTU
FSST
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
LCTU
FSST
Financial Services
LCTU
FSST
Consumer Cyclical
LCTU
FSST
Communication Services
LCTU
FSST
Healthcare
LCTU
FSST
Industrials
LCTU
FSST
Consumer Defensive
LCTU
FSST
Energy
LCTU
FSST
Utilities
LCTU
FSST
Real Estate
LCTU
FSST
Basic Materials
LCTU
FSST
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCTU vs. FSST — Risk / Return Rank
LCTU
FSST
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LCTU vs. FSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCTU | FSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCTU vs. FSST - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCTU | FSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | — | — |
Volatility
LCTU vs. FSST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCTU | FSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.79% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | — | — |
LCTU vs. FSST - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FSST's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCTU vs. FSST - Dividend Comparison
LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while FSST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.10% | 0.19% | 2.01% | 0.68% | 1.00% | 0.34% |
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 0.98% | 1.02% | 1.27% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 2.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCTU and FSST have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCTU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCTU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FSST.
LCTU has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.10% for FSST.
LCTU is categorized as ESG, while FSST is Sustainable. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LCTU and 0.59% for FSST.
Find the right allocation for LCTU and FSST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer