FSST vs. VGT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FSST (Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSST is a Sustainable fund tracking the Russell 3000, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FSST charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.

Performance

FSST vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FSST

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

VGT

• 1D: 1.76%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 22.59%
• YTD: 22.47%
• 1Y: 37.19%
• 3Y*: 29.10%
• 5Y*: 18.09%
• 10Y*: 24.01%
• ALL TIME*: 14.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	$454.00M	$507.98M	$575.23M

FSST vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF	0.00%	15.40%	21.40%	25.49%	-18.30%	12.52%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	22.47%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	20.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FSST and VGT is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between FSST and VGT has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FSST vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSST	VGT
Technology	29.6%	98.6%
Industrials	13.0%	0.4%
Financial Services	12.1%	0.5%
Communication Services	11.7%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	0.1%
Healthcare	10.2%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	-
Basic Materials	3.4%	0.0%
Energy	1.9%	0.3%
Real Estate	1.3%	-
Utilities	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

FSST vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSST

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 60
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 59
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSST vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSST	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.54	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.09	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.28	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.12	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FSST	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-54.63%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.40%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-8.34%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.95%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FSST	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	24.25%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	25.85%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	24.90%	—

FSST vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSST has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSST vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

FSST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF	0.10%	0.19%	2.01%	0.68%	1.00%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.38%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSST and VGT in my portfolio?

FSST and VGT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FSST or VGT?

On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSST or VGT?

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FSST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSST or VGT?

VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.10% for FSST.

What is the main difference between FSST and VGT?

FSST is categorized as Sustainable, while VGT is Technology Equities. FSST tracks Russell 3000, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FSST and 0.09% for VGT.