FSST vs. FTQGX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FSST (Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF) and FTQGX (Fidelity Focused Stock Fund) are both funds - FSST is a Sustainable fund tracking the Russell 3000, while FTQGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FSST is passively managed, while FTQGX is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FSST charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FTQGX.

Performance

FSST vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FSST

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FTQGX

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -4.27%
• 6M: 14.06%
• YTD: 19.83%
• 1Y: 30.50%
• 3Y*: 24.50%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 18.11%
• ALL TIME*: 10.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FSST vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF	0.00%	15.40%	21.40%	25.49%	-18.30%	12.52%
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	19.83%	13.65%	36.95%	28.94%	-26.68%	13.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FSST and FTQGX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between FSST and FTQGX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FSST vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSST

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTQGX

FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 41
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSST vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSST	FTQGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.18	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.68	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.11	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.11	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FSST	FTQGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-61.29%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.76%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-9.47%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-14.14%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.78%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FSST	FTQGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.85%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	22.24%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.83%	—

FSST vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSST has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQGX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSST vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

FSST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF	0.10%	0.19%	2.01%	0.68%	1.00%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	10.38%	12.44%	9.94%	0.61%	7.96%	13.53%	11.41%	5.07%	14.71%	5.89%	1.08%	5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSST and FTQGX in my portfolio?

FSST and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.