LCO vs. EAOA
LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. LCO is actively managed, while EAOA is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOA.
Performance
LCO vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOA
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- 24.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- —
LCO vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 11.44% |
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 8.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCO and EAOA is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCO vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank
LCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EAOA
LCO vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCO | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCO vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, smaller than the maximum EAOA drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and EAOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCO | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -25.06% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -0.54% | -3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -5.28% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility
LCO vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCO | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.73% | 11.35% | +14.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 13.35% | +12.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 13.19% | +12.54% |
LCO vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCO vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison
LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 1.95% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% |
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCO and EAOA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.
EAOA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.
They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 0.18% for EAOA.
Find the right allocation for LCO and EAOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer