LCO vs. CTAP
LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.
Performance
LCO vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCO
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTAP
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -14.75%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- -1.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCO vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 7.35% |
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCO and CTAP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCO vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCO vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, smaller than the maximum CTAP drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and CTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCO | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -20.48% | +9.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.21% | -20.48% | +13.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -3.46% | -1.12% |
Volatility
LCO vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCO | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.90% | 24.71% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.90% | 24.71% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.90% | 24.71% | +1.19% |
LCO vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCO vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison
LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 1.96% |
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCO and CTAP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.
CTAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.
They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 0.10% for CTAP.
Find the right allocation for LCO and CTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer