LCO vs. EAOR
LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. LCO is actively managed, while EAOR is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOR.
Performance
LCO vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCO
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- 6M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOR
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 1Y
- 14.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- —
LCO vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 2.14% |
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 5.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCO and EAOR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCO vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank
LCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EAOR
LCO vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCO | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCO vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.72%, smaller than the maximum EAOR drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and EAOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCO | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -22.91% | +11.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.72% | -1.43% | -10.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -4.97% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.56% | — |
Volatility
LCO vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCO | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.32% | 9.13% | +16.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 10.63% | +14.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 10.41% | +14.91% |
LCO vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCO vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison
LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 1.99% | 1.39% | 1.07% |
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCO and EAOR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.
EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.
They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 0.18% for EAOR.
Find the right allocation for LCO and EAOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer