LC vs. FDMO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LC (LendingClub Corporation) is a stock, while FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index. Over the past 5 years, LC returned -0.26%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for FDMO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LC vs. FDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LendingClub Corporation (LC) and Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LC achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than FDMO's 13.91% return.

LC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 22.90%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: -2.73%
• 1Y: 66.32%
• 3Y*: 27.04%
• 5Y*: -0.26%
• 10Y*: -1.97%

FDMO

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 13.91%
• 6M: 11.69%
• 1Y: 28.77%
• 3Y*: 27.46%
• 5Y*: 15.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LC vs. FDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LC LendingClub Corporation	1.43%	16.99%	85.24%	-0.68%	-63.61%	128.98%	-16.32%	-4.03%	-36.32%	-21.33%
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	13.91%	21.43%	32.78%	24.79%	-19.32%	22.23%	21.71%	25.29%	-4.13%	23.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LC and FDMO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.48

The correlation between LC and FDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LC vs. FDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FDMO

FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 53
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LC vs. FDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LendingClub Corporation (LC) and Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LC	FDMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.62	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.22	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	2.37	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	9.22	-4.86

LC vs. FDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LC Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the FDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LC and FDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LC vs. FDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LC drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than FDMO's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LC and FDMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LC	FDMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.84%	-33.94%	-62.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.28%	-12.22%	-26.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.53%	-21.88%	-31.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.48%	-25.44%	-64.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.23%	-3.26%	-82.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.58%	-5.40%	-78.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.16%	3.13%	+14.03%

Volatility

LC vs. FDMO - Volatility Comparison

LendingClub Corporation (LC) has a higher volatility of 15.60% compared to Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) at 7.78%. This indicates that LC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LC	FDMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.60%	7.78%	+7.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.56%	14.53%	+27.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.55%	17.86%	+37.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.16%	19.25%	+45.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.12%	19.58%	+43.54%

Dividends

LC vs. FDMO - Dividend Comparison

LC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	0.60%	0.61%	0.90%	0.87%	1.19%	0.60%	0.77%	1.23%	1.22%	1.09%	0.45%
LC LendingClub Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LC and FDMO in my portfolio?

LC and FDMO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LC or FDMO?

LC has higher volatility (15.60%) compared to FDMO (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LC dropped -96.84% vs FDMO's -33.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.