PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LC vs. NIU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LCNIU
YTD Return73.00%-8.68%
1Y Return163.41%-18.03%
3Y Return (Ann)-29.80%-57.32%
5Y Return (Ann)2.25%-25.98%
Sharpe Ratio3.14-0.20
Sortino Ratio4.030.24
Omega Ratio1.461.03
Calmar Ratio1.74-0.16
Martin Ratio19.55-0.61
Ulcer Index8.55%24.82%
Daily Std Dev53.18%75.23%
Max Drawdown-96.84%-96.70%
Current Drawdown-89.16%-95.95%

Fundamentals


LCNIU
Market Cap$1.76B$165.28M
EPS$0.46-$0.51
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.16B$1.92B
Gross Profit (TTM)$756.22M$346.18M
EBITDA (TTM)$244.67M-$201.96M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between LC and NIU is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LC vs. NIU - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LC achieves a 73.00% return, which is significantly higher than NIU's -8.68% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
61.36%
-19.02%
LC
NIU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LC vs. NIU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LendingClub Corporation (LC) and Niu Technologies (NIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LC, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LC, currently valued at 4.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LC, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LC, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.88
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LC, currently valued at 19.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0019.55
NIU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NIU, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NIU, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NIU, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NIU, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NIU, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.61

LC vs. NIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LC Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the NIU Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LC and NIU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.14
-0.20
LC
NIU

Dividends

LC vs. NIU - Dividend Comparison

Neither LC nor NIU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LC vs. NIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LC drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, roughly equal to the maximum NIU drawdown of -96.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LC and NIU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-68.24%
-95.95%
LC
NIU

Volatility

LC vs. NIU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LendingClub Corporation (LC) is 18.00%, while Niu Technologies (NIU) has a volatility of 24.28%. This indicates that LC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.00%
24.28%
LC
NIU

Financials

LC vs. NIU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LendingClub Corporation and Niu Technologies. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items