PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LC vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LCBAC
YTD Return72.31%36.69%
1Y Return182.55%68.51%
3Y Return (Ann)-31.12%1.35%
5Y Return (Ann)0.40%8.98%
Sharpe Ratio3.232.75
Sortino Ratio4.124.05
Omega Ratio1.471.49
Calmar Ratio1.811.59
Martin Ratio20.3912.11
Ulcer Index8.55%5.48%
Daily Std Dev53.90%24.08%
Max Drawdown-96.84%-93.45%
Current Drawdown-89.20%-1.66%

Fundamentals


LCBAC
Market Cap$1.69B$346.28B
EPS$0.46$2.76
PE Ratio32.7416.35
PEG Ratio-18.142.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.16B$95.85B
Gross Profit (TTM)$756.22M$94.17B
EBITDA (TTM)$244.67M$18.44B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between LC and BAC is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LC vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LC achieves a 72.31% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 36.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
67.23%
18.86%
LC
BAC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LC vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LendingClub Corporation (LC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LC, currently valued at 3.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LC, currently valued at 4.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.12
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LC, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LC, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.81
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LC, currently valued at 20.39, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0020.39
BAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAC, currently valued at 2.75, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.75
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAC, currently valued at 4.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.49
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAC, currently valued at 12.11, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.11

LC vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LC Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LC and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.23
2.75
LC
BAC

Dividends

LC vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

LC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LC
LendingClub Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.17%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%0.26%

Drawdowns

LC vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LC drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, roughly equal to the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LC and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-89.20%
-1.66%
LC
BAC

Volatility

LC vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

LendingClub Corporation (LC) has a higher volatility of 17.88% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 10.38%. This indicates that LC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.88%
10.38%
LC
BAC

Financials

LC vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LendingClub Corporation and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items