LC vs. BAC

In the year-to-date period, LC achieves a -32.30% return, which is significantly lower than BAC's -9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, LC has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of -19.04%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.13% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LendingClub Corporation (LC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LC Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LC and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.

The maximum LC drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, roughly equal to the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LC and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

LendingClub Corporation (LC) has a higher volatility of 26.40% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 18.10%. This indicates that LC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LendingClub Corporation and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.