PortfoliosLab logo
LC vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LC and BAC is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LC vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LendingClub Corporation (LC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LC:

0.19

BAC:

0.58

Sortino Ratio

LC:

0.70

BAC:

1.01

Omega Ratio

LC:

1.09

BAC:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

LC:

0.12

BAC:

0.65

Martin Ratio

LC:

0.52

BAC:

1.95

Ulcer Index

LC:

22.28%

BAC:

9.18%

Daily Std Dev

LC:

58.42%

BAC:

29.01%

Max Drawdown

LC:

-96.84%

BAC:

-93.45%

Current Drawdown

LC:

-92.42%

BAC:

-5.63%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LC:

$1.22B

BAC:

$336.60B

EPS

LC:

$0.44

BAC:

$3.35

PE Ratio

LC:

24.18

BAC:

13.34

PEG Ratio

LC:

-18.14

BAC:

1.68

PS Ratio

LC:

1.02

BAC:

3.45

PB Ratio

LC:

0.89

BAC:

1.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

LC:

$908.40M

BAC:

$123.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LC:

$560.47M

BAC:

$78.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

LC:

$191.16M

BAC:

$65.96B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LC achieves a -34.71% return, which is significantly lower than BAC's 2.51% return. Over the past 10 years, LC has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of -19.47%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.69% annualized return.


LC

YTD

-34.71%

1M

11.26%

6M

-30.41%

1Y

11.26%

3Y*

-6.86%

5Y*

13.75%

10Y*

-19.47%

BAC

YTD

2.51%

1M

19.67%

6M

-3.03%

1Y

16.76%

3Y*

12.73%

5Y*

17.22%

10Y*

12.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LendingClub Corporation

Bank of America Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LC vs. BAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LC is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LC is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LC is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LC is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LC is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LC is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAC is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAC is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAC is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAC is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAC is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAC is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LC vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LendingClub Corporation (LC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LC Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LC and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LC vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

LC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LC
LendingClub Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.28%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%

Drawdowns

LC vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LC drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, roughly equal to the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LC and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LC vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

LendingClub Corporation (LC) has a higher volatility of 19.02% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 6.11%. This indicates that LC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LC vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LendingClub Corporation and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
299.81M
46.99B
(LC) Total Revenue
(BAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LC vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LendingClub Corporation and Bank of America Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
56.3%
58.2%
(LC) Gross Margin
(BAC) Gross Margin
LC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LendingClub Corporation reported a gross profit of 168.63M and revenue of 299.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.3%.

BAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 27.37B and revenue of 46.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.

LC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LendingClub Corporation reported an operating income of 125.28M and revenue of 299.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.8%.

BAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 9.60B and revenue of 46.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

LC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LendingClub Corporation reported a net income of 11.67M and revenue of 299.81M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

BAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 46.99B, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.