LC vs. TREE
LC (LendingClub Corporation) and TREE (LendingTree, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — LC in Credit Services, TREE in Financial Conglomerates. Over the past 10 years, LC returned -1.97%/yr vs -7.31%/yr for TREE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LC vs. TREE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LC achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than TREE's -30.89% return. Over the past 10 years, LC has outperformed TREE with an annualized return of -1.97%, while TREE has yielded a comparatively lower -7.31% annualized return.
LC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 22.90%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- -3.66%
- 1Y
- 74.48%
- 3Y*
- 27.04%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- -1.97%
TREE
- 1D
- -6.09%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- -30.89%
- 6M
- -30.38%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- -30.15%
- 10Y*
- -7.31%
LC vs. TREE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LC LendingClub Corporation | 1.43% | 16.99% | 85.24% | -0.68% | -63.61% | 128.98% | -16.32% | -4.03% | -36.32% | -21.33% |
TREE LendingTree, Inc. | -30.89% | 37.01% | 27.80% | 42.15% | -82.60% | -55.22% | -9.77% | 38.20% | -35.51% | 235.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LC and TREE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2014 | 0.43 |
The correlation between LC and TREE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LC:
$2.25B
TREE:
$518.69M
LC:
$1.49
TREE:
$13.14
LC:
12.86
TREE:
2.79
LC:
0.03
TREE:
0.01
LC:
1.74
TREE:
0.42
LC:
1.48
TREE:
1.70
LC:
$1.30B
TREE:
$1.20B
LC:
$872.66M
TREE:
$1.14B
LC:
$309.10M
TREE:
$120.37M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LC vs. TREE — Risk / Return Rank
LC
TREE
LC vs. TREE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LendingClub Corporation (LC) and LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LC | TREE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.08 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 0.09 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 0.16 | +4.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LC vs. TREE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LC drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, roughly equal to the maximum TREE drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LC and TREE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LC | TREE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.84% | -97.59% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.28% | -56.55% | +18.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.53% | -62.85% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.48% | -95.38% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.48% | -97.59% | +8.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.23% | -91.53% | +5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.58% | -43.97% | -39.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.16% | 32.80% | -15.64% |
Volatility
LC vs. TREE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LendingClub Corporation (LC) is 15.60%, while LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) has a volatility of 17.34%. This indicates that LC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TREE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LC | TREE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.60% | 17.34% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.56% | 56.10% | -14.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.55% | 69.07% | -13.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.16% | 74.27% | -9.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.12% | 64.40% | -1.28% |
Dividends
LC vs. TREE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LC nor TREE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LC vs. TREE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LendingClub Corporation and LendingTree, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LC vs. TREE - Profitability Comparison
LC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LendingClub Corporation reported a gross profit of 177.54M and revenue of 261.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.0%.
TREE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LendingTree, Inc. reported a gross profit of 315.57M and revenue of 327.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.4%.
LC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LendingClub Corporation reported an operating income of 122.12M and revenue of 261.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.8%.
TREE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LendingTree, Inc. reported an operating income of 31.11M and revenue of 327.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.
LC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LendingClub Corporation reported a net income of 51.60M and revenue of 261.21M, resulting in a net margin of 19.8%.
TREE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LendingTree, Inc. reported a net income of 17.27M and revenue of 327.27M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LC and TREE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TREE has higher volatility (17.34%) compared to LC (15.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LC dropped -96.84% vs TREE's -97.59%.
LC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LC and TREE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer