PortfoliosLab logo
LC vs. TREE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LC and TREE is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

LC vs. TREE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LendingClub Corporation (LC) and LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-90.64%
19.53%
LC
TREE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LC:

0.56

TREE:

0.49

Sortino Ratio

LC:

1.23

TREE:

1.30

Omega Ratio

LC:

1.15

TREE:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

LC:

0.36

TREE:

0.41

Martin Ratio

LC:

1.70

TREE:

1.73

Ulcer Index

LC:

19.75%

TREE:

21.88%

Daily Std Dev

LC:

60.16%

TREE:

78.07%

Max Drawdown

LC:

-96.84%

TREE:

-97.59%

Current Drawdown

LC:

-92.14%

TREE:

-88.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LC:

$1.24B

TREE:

$690.31M

EPS

LC:

$0.45

TREE:

-$3.14

PEG Ratio

LC:

-18.14

TREE:

3.55

PS Ratio

LC:

1.07

TREE:

0.77

PB Ratio

LC:

0.93

TREE:

6.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

LC:

$608.58M

TREE:

$732.45M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LC:

$391.84M

TREE:

$698.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

LC:

$78.65M

TREE:

$49.64M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LC achieves a -32.30% return, which is significantly lower than TREE's 33.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LC has underperformed TREE with an annualized return of -19.04%, while TREE has yielded a comparatively higher -1.80% annualized return.


LC

YTD

-32.30%

1M

-2.32%

6M

-19.35%

1Y

36.66%

5Y*

10.57%

10Y*

-19.04%

TREE

YTD

33.01%

1M

-5.55%

6M

-3.43%

1Y

41.48%

5Y*

-24.94%

10Y*

-1.80%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LC vs. TREE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LC is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LC is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LC is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LC is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LC is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TREE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TREE is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TREE is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TREE is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TREE is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TREE is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TREE is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LC vs. TREE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LendingClub Corporation (LC) and LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LC, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
LC: 0.56
TREE: 0.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for LC, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LC: 1.23
TREE: 1.30
The chart of Omega ratio for LC, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LC: 1.15
TREE: 1.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for LC, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
LC: 0.36
TREE: 0.41
The chart of Martin ratio for LC, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
LC: 1.70
TREE: 1.73

The current LC Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the TREE Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LC and TREE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.56
0.49
LC
TREE

Dividends

LC vs. TREE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LC nor TREE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LC vs. TREE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LC drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, roughly equal to the maximum TREE drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LC and TREE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-94.00%-92.00%-90.00%-88.00%-86.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-92.14%
-88.11%
LC
TREE

Volatility

LC vs. TREE - Volatility Comparison

LendingClub Corporation (LC) has a higher volatility of 26.40% compared to LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) at 23.94%. This indicates that LC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TREE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
26.40%
23.94%
LC
TREE

Financials

LC vs. TREE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LendingClub Corporation and LendingTree, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items