PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LC vs. TREE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LCTREE
YTD Return73.00%59.80%
1Y Return163.41%193.81%
3Y Return (Ann)-29.80%-30.30%
5Y Return (Ann)2.25%-33.47%
Sharpe Ratio3.142.56
Sortino Ratio4.033.09
Omega Ratio1.461.39
Calmar Ratio1.742.09
Martin Ratio19.5518.28
Ulcer Index8.55%11.01%
Daily Std Dev53.18%78.48%
Max Drawdown-96.84%-97.59%
Current Drawdown-89.16%-88.82%

Fundamentals


LCTREE
Market Cap$1.76B$721.68M
EPS$0.46-$2.72
PEG Ratio-18.143.55
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.16B$773.05M
Gross Profit (TTM)$756.22M$720.32M
EBITDA (TTM)$244.67M-$5.51M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between LC and TREE is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LC vs. TREE - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LC achieves a 73.00% return, which is significantly higher than TREE's 59.80% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
61.38%
5.30%
LC
TREE

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LC vs. TREE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LendingClub Corporation (LC) and LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LC, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LC, currently valued at 4.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LC, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LC, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LC, currently valued at 19.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0019.55
TREE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TREE, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.56
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TREE, currently valued at 3.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TREE, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TREE, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TREE, currently valued at 18.28, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0018.28

LC vs. TREE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LC Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is comparable to the TREE Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LC and TREE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.14
2.56
LC
TREE

Dividends

LC vs. TREE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LC nor TREE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LC vs. TREE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LC drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, roughly equal to the maximum TREE drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LC and TREE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-94.00%-92.00%-90.00%-88.00%-86.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-89.16%
-88.82%
LC
TREE

Volatility

LC vs. TREE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LendingClub Corporation (LC) is 18.00%, while LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) has a volatility of 31.12%. This indicates that LC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TREE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.00%
31.12%
LC
TREE

Financials

LC vs. TREE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LendingClub Corporation and LendingTree, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items