LAES vs. SMR
LAES (SEALSQ Corp) and SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) are both stocks. LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while SMR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, LAES returned -33.31%/yr vs 5.43%/yr for SMR. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAES vs. SMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAES achieves a -17.99% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -30.20% return.
LAES
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- -17.99%
- 6M
- -26.89%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- -33.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMR
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -17.31%
- YTD
- -30.20%
- 6M
- -46.07%
- 1Y
- -75.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
LAES vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -17.99% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -92.82% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -30.20% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -62.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAES and SMR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, LAES and SMR have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LAES:
-$0.43
SMR:
-$2.02
LAES:
10.21
SMR:
104.42
LAES:
$35.37M
SMR:
$18.10M
LAES:
$13.21M
SMR:
$4.45M
LAES:
-$41.81M
SMR:
-$696.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAES vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank
LAES
SMR
LAES vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAES | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.87 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | -0.91 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | -1.32 | +0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAES vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAES drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, which is greater than SMR's maximum drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAES and SMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAES | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.44% | -87.47% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.68% | -82.86% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.07% | -82.86% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -87.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.89% | -81.49% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.60% | -35.08% | -49.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.58% | 57.39% | -13.81% |
Volatility
LAES vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison
SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) have volatilities of 28.38% and 28.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAES | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.38% | 28.93% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.23% | 69.57% | -3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.13% | 102.59% | +6.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.29% | 93.50% | +76.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.29% | 89.31% | +80.98% |
Dividends
LAES vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison
Neither LAES nor SMR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LAES vs. SMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SEALSQ Corp and NuScale Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LAES and SMR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (28.93%) compared to LAES (28.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAES dropped -98.44% vs SMR's -87.47%.
LAES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.25 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAES and SMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer