SMR vs. RYCEY
SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) and RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — SMR in Specialty Industrial Machinery, RYCEY in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 5 years, SMR returned -2.02%/yr vs 68.87%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMR vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -36.20% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 23.43% return.
SMR
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -8.59%
- 6M
- -55.92%
- YTD
- -36.20%
- 1Y
- -75.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- -2.02%
- 10Y*
- —
RYCEY
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 9.79%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- YTD
- 23.43%
- 1Y
- 45.07%
- 3Y*
- 118.99%
- 5Y*
- 68.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
SMR vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -36.20% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.20% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 23.43% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -13.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMR and RYCEY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
SMR:
$2.69B
RYCEY:
$161.31B
SMR:
-$1.83
RYCEY:
£0.99
SMR:
105.05
RYCEY:
3.02
SMR:
2.48
RYCEY:
44.41
SMR:
$18.10M
RYCEY:
£40.04B
SMR:
$4.45M
RYCEY:
£10.10B
SMR:
-$696.20M
RYCEY:
£8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMR vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank
SMR
RYCEY
SMR vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMR | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.22 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 2.06 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 5.77 | -6.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMR vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and RYCEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMR | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.47% | -99.07% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.60% | -21.75% | -61.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.60% | -23.37% | -60.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.47% | -62.01% | -25.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.08% | -75.50% | -7.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -84.10% | +48.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 61.26% | 7.75% | +53.51% |
Volatility
SMR vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison
NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a higher volatility of 23.32% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 9.37%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMR | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.32% | 9.37% | +13.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.67% | 32.99% | +33.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.07% | 38.25% | +62.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.04% | 43.42% | +50.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.21% | 49.25% | +39.96% |
Dividends
SMR vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison
SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.66% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SMR vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NuScale Power Corporation and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SMR and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (23.32%) compared to RYCEY (9.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMR dropped -87.47% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.
RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMR and RYCEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer