SMR vs. RYCEY
SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) and RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — SMR in Specialty Industrial Machinery, RYCEY in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 5 years, SMR returned 2.37%/yr vs 65.23%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMR vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -20.68% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 19.98% return.
SMR
- 1D
- -4.26%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -20.68%
- 6M
- -31.59%
- 1Y
- -69.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- —
RYCEY
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 12.12%
- YTD
- 19.98%
- 6M
- 20.21%
- 1Y
- 56.29%
- 3Y*
- 115.03%
- 5Y*
- 65.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
SMR vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -20.68% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.20% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 19.98% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -13.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMR and RYCEY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
SMR:
$3.59B
RYCEY:
$157.80B
SMR:
-$2.02
RYCEY:
£0.99
SMR:
118.67
RYCEY:
2.99
SMR:
3.08
RYCEY:
43.86
SMR:
$18.10M
RYCEY:
£40.04B
SMR:
$4.45M
RYCEY:
£10.10B
SMR:
-$696.20M
RYCEY:
£8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMR vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank
SMR
RYCEY
SMR vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMR | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.27 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 2.60 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 7.30 | -8.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMR vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and RYCEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMR | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.47% | -99.07% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.86% | -21.75% | -61.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.86% | -23.37% | -59.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.47% | -62.01% | -25.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.96% | -76.18% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.24% | -84.14% | +48.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.47% | 7.73% | +50.74% |
Volatility
SMR vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison
NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a higher volatility of 32.27% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 9.62%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMR | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.27% | 9.62% | +22.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.62% | 32.96% | +36.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.52% | 38.13% | +65.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.93% | 43.46% | +50.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.48% | 49.36% | +40.12% |
Dividends
SMR vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison
SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.68% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SMR vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NuScale Power Corporation and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SMR and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (32.27%) compared to RYCEY (9.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMR dropped -87.47% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.
RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMR and RYCEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer