SMR vs. PLTR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nuscale Power Corp (SMR) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR).

Performance

SMR vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuscale Power Corp (SMR) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMR vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SMR Nuscale Power Corp	-23.50%	-20.97%	444.98%	-67.93%	2.29%	-0.89%	1.71%
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc.	-17.70%	135.03%	340.48%	167.45%	-64.74%	-22.68%	-11.57%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SMR : $1.77B PLTR : $376.45B
EPS SMR : -$2.40 PLTR : $0.63
PB Ratio SMR : 1.52 PLTR : 50.96
Total Revenue (TTM) SMR : $0.00 PLTR : $4.48B
Gross Profit (TTM) SMR : $11.43M PLTR : $3.69B
EBITDA (TTM) SMR : -$673.69M PLTR : $1.52B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -23.50% return, which is significantly lower than PLTR's -17.70% return.

SMR

• 1D: 5.76%
• 1M: -15.64%
• YTD: -23.50%
• 6M: -69.89%
• 1Y: -23.45%
• 3Y*: 6.04%
• 5Y*: 1.50%
• 10Y*: —

PLTR

• 1D: 6.35%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: -17.70%
• 6M: -19.81%
• 1Y: 73.32%
• 3Y*: 158.69%
• 5Y*: 44.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SMR vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMR

SMR Risk / Return Rank: 35
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 33

PLTR

PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 77
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMR vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuscale Power Corp (SMR) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMR	PLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	1.28	-1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	1.85	-1.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.24	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	1.86	-2.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.61	4.55	-5.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMR vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMR and PLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMR	PLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	1.28	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.69	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.92	-0.90

Correlation

The correlation between SMR and PLTR is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SMR vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMR nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SMR vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and PLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMR	PLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.47%	-84.62%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-80.82%	-37.81%	-43.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.47%	-79.14%	-8.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.71%	-29.39%	-50.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.44%	-40.57%	+7.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.28%	15.48%	+29.80%

Volatility

SMR vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

Nuscale Power Corp (SMR) has a higher volatility of 16.44% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 14.75%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMR	PLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.44%	14.75%	+1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	72.55%	37.73%	+34.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	105.05%	57.68%	+47.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.95%	65.50%	+25.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.52%	70.22%	+18.30%

Financials