SMR vs. NLR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nuscale Power Corp (SMR) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).

NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007.

Performance

SMR vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuscale Power Corp (SMR) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMR vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SMR Nuscale Power Corp	-27.59%	-20.97%	444.98%	-67.93%	2.29%	-0.89%	1.71%
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF	8.18%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	4.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -27.59% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 8.18% return.

SMR

• 1D: -5.35%
• 1M: -21.38%
• YTD: -27.59%
• 6M: -71.97%
• 1Y: -29.92%
• 3Y*: 4.12%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: —

NLR

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -12.66%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 0.14%
• 1Y: 85.99%
• 3Y*: 37.72%
• 5Y*: 23.55%
• 10Y*: 13.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SMR vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMR

SMR Risk / Return Rank: 32
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 34
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 86
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 82
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMR vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuscale Power Corp (SMR) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMR	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	2.05	-2.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.27	2.62	-2.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.33	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	3.41	-3.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	8.20	-8.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMR vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMR and NLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMR	NLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	2.05	-2.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	0.84	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.18	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between SMR and NLR is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SMR vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMR Nuscale Power Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF	2.36%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Drawdowns

SMR vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMR	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.47%	-65.05%	-22.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-80.82%	-25.80%	-55.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.47%	-30.48%	-56.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.80%	-18.26%	-62.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.48%	-35.90%	+2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.57%	10.73%	+34.84%

Volatility

SMR vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

Nuscale Power Corp (SMR) has a higher volatility of 16.79% compared to VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) at 12.53%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMR	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.79%	12.53%	+4.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	72.53%	32.94%	+39.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	105.05%	42.20%	+62.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.98%	28.16%	+62.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.52%	23.38%	+65.14%