PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LADR vs. RWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LADR vs. RWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LADR achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly lower than RWT's -3.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LADR has outperformed RWT with an annualized return of 6.25%, while RWT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.16% annualized return.


LADR

1D
0.89%
1M
1.90%
YTD
-4.97%
6M
-6.32%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
6.25%

RWT

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-3.53%
6M
-4.87%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
-6.67%
10Y*
-1.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LADR vs. RWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LADR
Ladder Capital Corp
-4.97%6.69%5.53%25.22%-8.95%31.28%-40.80%26.36%24.54%8.52%
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
-3.53%-4.08%-2.60%21.61%-42.26%60.13%-42.70%18.16%9.40%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LADR and RWT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2014

0.56

The correlation between LADR and RWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

LADR:

$0.44

RWT:

-$0.48

PS Ratio

LADR:

3.21

RWT:

2.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

LADR:

$400.28M

RWT:

$269.15M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LADR:

$284.72M

RWT:

$1.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

LADR:

$276.22M

RWT:

$1.06B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LADR vs. RWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LADR
LADR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
LADR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
LADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LADR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

RWT
RWT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LADR vs. RWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LADRRWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.06

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

0.22

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

0.44

+0.30

LADR vs. RWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LADR Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the RWT Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LADR and RWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LADR vs. RWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LADR drawdown since its inception was -81.63%, smaller than the maximum RWT drawdown of -88.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LADR and RWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LADRRWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.63%

-88.91%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.68%

-21.22%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.22%

-33.79%

+13.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.97%

-55.83%

+28.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.63%

-85.40%

+3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.32%

-59.40%

+50.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-45.59%

+27.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

10.58%

-3.92%

Volatility

LADR vs. RWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) is 5.72%, while Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that LADR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LADRRWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

7.87%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

29.25%

-14.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.39%

36.13%

-17.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.76%

35.10%

-10.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.24%

49.05%

-0.81%

Dividends

LADR vs. RWT - Dividend Comparison

LADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, less than RWT's 13.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LADR
Ladder Capital Corp
9.02%8.37%8.22%7.99%8.76%6.67%9.61%7.54%9.92%8.91%9.37%17.91%
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
13.95%13.02%10.26%9.58%13.61%5.91%8.26%7.26%7.83%7.56%7.36%8.48%

Financials

LADR vs. RWT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ladder Capital Corp and Redwood Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
103.34M
87.30M
(LADR) Total Revenue
(RWT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LADR and RWT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWT has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to LADR (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LADR dropped -81.63% vs RWT's -88.91%.

LADR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LADR and RWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer