LADR vs. BN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and Brookfield Corp (BN).

Performance

LADR vs. BN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and Brookfield Corp (BN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LADR vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LADR Ladder Capital Corp	-8.98%	6.69%	5.53%	25.22%	-8.95%	31.28%	-40.80%	26.36%	24.54%	8.52%
BN Brookfield Corp	-11.65%	20.54%	44.18%	28.60%	-34.80%	49.30%	8.99%	52.68%	-10.65%	33.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LADR : $1.23B BN : $95.79B
EPS LADR : $0.38 BN : $0.55
PE Ratio LADR : 25.51 BN : 73.13
PS Ratio LADR : 3.18 BN : 1.26
PB Ratio LADR : 0.83 BN : 2.19
Total Revenue (TTM) LADR : $387.43M BN : $76.13B
Gross Profit (TTM) LADR : $310.84M BN : $29.53B
EBITDA (TTM) LADR : $271.56M BN : $32.77B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LADR achieves a -8.98% return, which is significantly higher than BN's -11.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LADR has underperformed BN with an annualized return of 6.66%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.94% annualized return.

LADR

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -3.53%
• YTD: -8.98%
• 6M: -6.40%
• 1Y: -6.67%
• 3Y*: 9.98%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 6.66%

BN

• 1D: 4.52%
• 1M: -7.52%
• YTD: -11.65%
• 6M: -11.21%
• 1Y: 16.52%
• 3Y*: 23.90%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: 13.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LADR vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LADR

LADR Risk / Return Rank: 26
LADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
LADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
LADR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
LADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
LADR Martin Ratio Rank: 29

BN

BN Risk / Return Rank: 59
BN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BN Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BN Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BN Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LADR vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and Brookfield Corp (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LADR	BN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	0.50	-0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	0.89	-1.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.12	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.36	0.81	-1.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	2.40	-3.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LADR vs. BN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LADR Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the BN Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LADR and BN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LADR	BN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33	0.50	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	0.39	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	0.47	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.30	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between LADR and BN is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LADR vs. BN - Dividend Comparison

LADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.42%, more than BN's 0.62% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LADR Ladder Capital Corp	9.42%	8.37%	8.22%	7.99%	8.76%	6.67%	9.61%	7.54%	9.92%	8.91%	9.37%	17.91%
BN Brookfield Corp	0.62%	0.52%	0.56%	0.70%	1.44%	1.12%	1.55%	1.11%	1.56%	1.29%	1.58%	1.50%

Drawdowns

LADR vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LADR drawdown since its inception was -81.63%, roughly equal to the maximum BN drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LADR and BN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LADR	BN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.63%	-82.22%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.68%	-22.05%	+7.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.97%	-41.85%	+14.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.63%	-51.42%	-30.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.15%	-17.55%	+4.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.44%	-28.61%	+10.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.78%	7.40%	-0.62%

Volatility

LADR vs. BN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) is 5.39%, while Brookfield Corp (BN) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that LADR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LADR	BN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	9.96%	-4.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.14%	21.50%	-7.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.46%	33.43%	-12.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.01%	30.94%	-5.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.28%	30.06%	+18.22%

Financials

LADR vs. BN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ladder Capital Corp and Brookfield Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LADR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported a gross profit of 76.96M and revenue of 96.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.0%.

BN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported a gross profit of 8.91B and revenue of 21.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.1%.

LADR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported an operating income of 61.24M and revenue of 96.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.7%.

BN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported an operating income of 8.89B and revenue of 21.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.9%.

LADR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported a net income of 29.00K and revenue of 96.18M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

BN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported a net income of 743.00M and revenue of 21.18B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.