LADR vs. BN
LADR (Ladder Capital Corp) and BN (Brookfield Corporation) are both stocks. LADR operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate), while BN operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LADR returned 5.77%/yr vs 14.82%/yr for BN. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LADR vs. BN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LADR achieves a -8.88% return, which is significantly lower than BN's -7.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LADR has underperformed BN with an annualized return of 5.77%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 14.82% annualized return.
LADR
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- 6M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- -8.88%
- 1Y
- -4.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- 5.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.14%
BN
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- 6M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -7.01%
- 1Y
- -1.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $176.68M | $154.59M | $192.46M | |
| $13.44M | $11.58M | $9.91M |
LADR vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LADR Ladder Capital Corp | -8.88% | 6.69% | 5.53% | 25.22% | -8.95% | 31.28% | -40.80% | 26.36% | 24.54% | 8.52% |
BN Brookfield Corporation | -7.01% | 20.54% | 44.18% | 28.60% | -34.80% | 49.30% | 8.99% | 52.68% | -10.65% | 33.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LADR and BN is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2014 | 0.45 |
The correlation between LADR and BN shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LADR:
$1.21B
BN:
$94.99B
LADR:
$0.41
BN:
$0.56
LADR:
23.04
BN:
75.35
LADR:
1.09
BN:
165.12
LADR:
3.16
BN:
1.31
LADR:
0.84
BN:
2.35
LADR:
$380.27M
BN:
$76.58B
LADR:
$236.98M
BN:
$27.02B
LADR:
$196.29M
BN:
$31.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LADR vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank
LADR
BN
LADR vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and Brookfield Corporation (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LADR | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.00 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | -0.20 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | -0.47 | -0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LADR vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LADR drawdown since its inception was -81.63%, roughly equal to the maximum BN drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LADR and BN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LADR | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.63% | -82.22% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -22.05% | +7.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -27.84% | +12.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.97% | -41.85% | +14.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.63% | -51.42% | -30.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.05% | -13.21% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.20% | -28.46% | +10.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.32% | 9.06% | -1.74% |
Volatility
LADR vs. BN - Volatility Comparison
Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to Brookfield Corporation (BN) at 6.14%. This indicates that LADR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LADR | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 6.14% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.41% | 21.71% | -6.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | 28.20% | -8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 31.15% | -6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.16% | 30.15% | +18.01% |
Dividends
LADR vs. BN - Dividend Comparison
LADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, more than BN's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN Brookfield Corporation | 0.61% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.70% | 1.44% | 1.12% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.50% |
LADR Ladder Capital Corp | 9.62% | 8.37% | 8.22% | 7.99% | 8.76% | 6.67% | 9.61% | 7.54% | 9.92% | 8.91% | 9.37% | 17.91% |
Financials
LADR vs. BN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ladder Capital Corp and Brookfield Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LADR vs. BN - Profitability Comparison
LADR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported a gross profit of 22.59M and revenue of 78.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.
BN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.43B and revenue of 18.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
LADR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported an operating income of -18.86M and revenue of 78.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -24.1%.
BN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported an operating income of 4.39B and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
LADR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported a net income of 14.56M and revenue of 78.20M, resulting in a net margin of 18.6%.
BN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a net income of 100.59M and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LADR and BN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LADR has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to BN (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LADR dropped -81.63% vs BN's -82.22%.
BN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LADR and BN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer