PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWT vs. PSEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RWT vs. PSEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) and Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWT achieves a -2.41% return, which is significantly higher than PSEC's -5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RWT has underperformed PSEC with an annualized return of -1.26%, while PSEC has yielded a comparatively higher -0.06% annualized return.


RWT

1D
-2.79%
1M
-6.79%
YTD
-2.41%
6M
-1.56%
1Y
7.19%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
-5.10%
10Y*
-1.26%

PSEC

1D
-6.61%
1M
-15.64%
YTD
-5.36%
6M
-5.64%
1Y
-15.41%
3Y*
-17.37%
5Y*
-13.64%
10Y*
-0.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWT vs. PSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
-2.41%-4.08%-2.60%21.61%-42.26%60.13%-42.70%18.16%9.40%4.49%
PSEC
Prospect Capital Corporation
-5.36%-28.86%-18.16%-4.13%-8.61%70.00%-3.54%13.83%4.09%-9.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RWT and PSEC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2004

0.38

The correlation between RWT and PSEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

RWT:

-$0.48

PSEC:

-$0.28

PS Ratio

RWT:

2.51

PSEC:

5.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

RWT:

$269.15M

PSEC:

$151.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RWT:

$1.06B

PSEC:

-$59.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

RWT:

$1.06B

PSEC:

-$94.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWT vs. PSEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWT
RWT Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
RWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PSEC
PSEC Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWT vs. PSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) and Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWTPSECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

-0.46

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.60

-0.47

+1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.94

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

-0.57

+0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.74

-1.06

+1.80

RWT vs. PSEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWT Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the PSEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWT and PSEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWTPSECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

-0.46

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

-0.49

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

-0.00

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.08

+0.03

Drawdowns

RWT vs. PSEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWT drawdown since its inception was -88.91%, which is greater than PSEC's maximum drawdown of -61.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWT and PSEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWTPSECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.91%

-61.51%

-27.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.91%

-27.04%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.79%

-50.64%

+16.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.83%

-57.21%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.40%

-57.21%

-28.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.93%

-54.34%

-4.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.58%

-15.60%

-29.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.78%

14.57%

-4.79%

Volatility

RWT vs. PSEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) is 6.40%, while Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC) has a volatility of 15.55%. This indicates that RWT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWTPSECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

15.55%

-9.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.77%

27.33%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.89%

33.80%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.07%

28.07%

+7.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.03%

27.36%

+21.67%

Dividends

RWT vs. PSEC - Dividend Comparison

RWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.79%, less than PSEC's 23.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSEC
Prospect Capital Corporation
23.45%20.85%16.01%12.02%10.30%8.56%13.31%11.18%11.41%13.45%11.98%14.72%
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
13.79%13.02%10.26%9.58%13.61%5.91%8.26%7.26%7.83%7.56%7.36%8.48%

Financials

RWT vs. PSEC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Redwood Trust, Inc. and Prospect Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
87.30M
123.07M
(RWT) Total Revenue
(PSEC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RWT and PSEC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSEC has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to RWT (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWT dropped -88.91% vs PSEC's -61.51%.

RWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWT and PSEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer