RWT vs. MAIN
RWT (Redwood Trust, Inc.) and MAIN (Main Street Capital Corporation) are both stocks. RWT operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate), while MAIN operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RWT returned -1.22%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for MAIN. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RWT vs. MAIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWT achieves a -6.70% return, which is significantly higher than MAIN's -13.89% return. Over the past 10 years, RWT has underperformed MAIN with an annualized return of -1.22%, while MAIN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
RWT
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- -6.70%
- 6M
- -6.02%
- 1Y
- -0.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.34%
- 5Y*
- -7.57%
- 10Y*
- -1.22%
MAIN
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- -13.89%
- 6M
- -11.80%
- 1Y
- -7.07%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
RWT vs. MAIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWT Redwood Trust, Inc. | -6.70% | -4.08% | -2.60% | 21.61% | -42.26% | 60.13% | -42.70% | 18.16% | 9.40% | 4.49% |
MAIN Main Street Capital Corporation | -13.89% | 10.74% | 47.30% | 28.22% | -11.37% | 48.31% | -19.54% | 36.88% | -8.27% | 16.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWT and MAIN is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2007 | 0.33 |
The correlation between RWT and MAIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RWT:
-$0.48
MAIN:
$5.22
RWT:
2.31
MAIN:
6.37
RWT:
$269.15M
MAIN:
$704.17M
RWT:
$1.06B
MAIN:
$499.08M
RWT:
$1.06B
MAIN:
$396.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWT vs. MAIN — Risk / Return Rank
RWT
MAIN
RWT vs. MAIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) and Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWT | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.97 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | -0.32 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | -0.61 | +0.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWT vs. MAIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWT drawdown since its inception was -88.91%, which is greater than MAIN's maximum drawdown of -64.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWT and MAIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWT | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.91% | -64.53% | -24.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.92% | -22.43% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.79% | -22.43% | -11.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.83% | -27.06% | -28.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.40% | -64.53% | -20.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.74% | -20.96% | -39.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.60% | -7.32% | -38.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.77% | 11.60% | -0.83% |
Volatility
RWT vs. MAIN - Volatility Comparison
Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) at 5.99%. This indicates that RWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWT | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 5.99% | +2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.29% | 20.14% | +9.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.28% | 24.90% | +11.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.14% | 21.55% | +13.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.09% | 27.32% | +21.77% |
Dividends
RWT vs. MAIN - Dividend Comparison
RWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.97%, more than MAIN's 8.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAIN Main Street Capital Corporation | 8.58% | 7.00% | 7.02% | 8.55% | 7.97% | 5.74% | 6.99% | 6.76% | 8.43% | 7.49% | 7.42% | 9.15% |
RWT Redwood Trust, Inc. | 14.97% | 13.02% | 10.26% | 9.58% | 13.61% | 5.91% | 8.26% | 7.26% | 7.83% | 7.56% | 7.36% | 8.48% |
Financials
RWT vs. MAIN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Redwood Trust, Inc. and Main Street Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RWT and MAIN have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWT has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to MAIN (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWT dropped -88.91% vs MAIN's -64.53%.
RWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWT and MAIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer