PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWT vs. O
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RWT vs. O - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) and Realty Income Corporation (O). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWT achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than O's 8.60% return. Over the past 10 years, RWT has underperformed O with an annualized return of -0.98%, while O has yielded a comparatively higher 4.62% annualized return.


RWT

1D
0.94%
1M
-6.28%
YTD
0.40%
6M
3.47%
1Y
13.13%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
-4.13%
10Y*
-0.98%

O

1D
0.60%
1M
-5.70%
YTD
8.60%
6M
6.98%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*
4.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWT vs. O - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
0.40%-4.08%-2.60%21.61%-42.26%60.13%-42.70%18.16%9.40%4.49%
O
Realty Income Corporation
8.60%12.20%-2.11%-4.55%-7.38%23.95%-11.60%21.27%15.94%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RWT and O is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 1995

0.38

The correlation between RWT and O shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

RWT:

-$0.48

O:

$1.17

PS Ratio

RWT:

2.58

O:

6.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

RWT:

$269.15M

O:

$5.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RWT:

$1.06B

O:

$3.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

RWT:

$1.06B

O:

$3.93B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWT vs. O — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWT
RWT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWT Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

O
O Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
O Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
O Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
O Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
O Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
O Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWT vs. O - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) and Realty Income Corporation (O). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWTODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

0.74

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.85

1.07

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.13

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.10

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.25

2.83

-1.59

RWT vs. O - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWT Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the O Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWT and O, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWTODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

0.74

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.14

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.18

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.48

-0.37

Drawdowns

RWT vs. O - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWT drawdown since its inception was -88.91%, which is greater than O's maximum drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWT and O.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.91%

-48.45%

-40.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.91%

-11.10%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.79%

-26.49%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.83%

-34.48%

-21.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.40%

-48.28%

-37.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.75%

-10.15%

-47.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.58%

-9.21%

-36.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.70%

4.32%

+5.38%

Volatility

RWT vs. O - Volatility Comparison

Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Realty Income Corporation (O) at 5.49%. This indicates that RWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than O based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

5.49%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.66%

11.72%

+16.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.79%

15.95%

+19.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.05%

18.87%

+16.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.03%

25.63%

+23.40%

Dividends

RWT vs. O - Dividend Comparison

RWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.41%, more than O's 5.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.40%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
13.41%13.02%10.26%9.58%13.61%5.91%8.26%7.26%7.83%7.56%7.36%8.48%

Financials

RWT vs. O - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Redwood Trust, Inc. and Realty Income Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
87.30M
1.55B
(RWT) Total Revenue
(O) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RWT and O have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWT has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to O (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWT dropped -88.91% vs O's -48.45%.

O currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWT and O

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer