RWT vs. LYG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG).

Performance

RWT vs. LYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RWT vs. LYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RWT Redwood Trust, Inc.	5.45%	-4.08%	-2.60%	21.61%	-42.26%	60.13%	-42.70%	18.16%	9.40%	4.49%
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc	-1.51%	103.71%	20.30%	14.68%	-9.47%	33.81%	-40.79%	36.81%	-28.35%	30.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RWT : $713.85M LYG : $78.03B
EPS RWT : -$0.61 LYG : $0.31
PS Ratio RWT : 3.00 LYG : 1.21
PB Ratio RWT : 0.73 LYG : 1.86
Total Revenue (TTM) RWT : $243.15M LYG : $65.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) RWT : $154.79M LYG : $65.00B
EBITDA (TTM) RWT : $733.18M LYG : $6.66B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWT achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly higher than LYG's -1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, RWT has underperformed LYG with an annualized return of 0.78%, while LYG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.63% annualized return.

RWT

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -4.25%
• YTD: 5.45%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 6.05%
• 3Y*: 5.05%
• 5Y*: -2.17%
• 10Y*: 0.78%

LYG

• 1D: 3.78%
• 1M: -4.57%
• YTD: -1.51%
• 6M: 15.49%
• 1Y: 43.24%
• 3Y*: 37.94%
• 5Y*: 22.84%
• 10Y*: 7.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RWT vs. LYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWT

RWT Risk / Return Rank: 45
RWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RWT Omega Ratio Rank: 42
RWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
RWT Martin Ratio Rank: 48

LYG

LYG Risk / Return Rank: 79
LYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LYG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
LYG Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWT vs. LYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RWT	LYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	1.49	-1.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	1.99	-1.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.27	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	1.89	-1.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.64	6.59	-5.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RWT vs. LYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWT Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the LYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWT and LYG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RWT	LYG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15	1.49	-1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	0.72	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02	0.21	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	-0.03	+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between RWT and LYG is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RWT vs. LYG - Dividend Comparison

RWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.77%, more than LYG's 3.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RWT Redwood Trust, Inc.	12.77%	13.02%	10.26%	9.58%	13.61%	5.91%	8.26%	7.26%	7.83%	7.56%	7.36%	8.48%
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc	3.24%	3.19%	5.44%	5.23%	4.92%	2.70%	0.00%	5.04%	6.63%	6.81%	5.17%	2.11%

Drawdowns

RWT vs. LYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWT drawdown since its inception was -88.91%, smaller than the maximum LYG drawdown of -94.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWT and LYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWT	LYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.91%	-94.84%	+5.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.91%	-22.72%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.83%	-40.19%	-15.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.40%	-68.72%	-16.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.63%	-59.30%	+3.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.52%	-63.47%	+17.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.95%	6.50%	+2.45%

Volatility

RWT vs. LYG - Volatility Comparison

Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) has a higher volatility of 12.39% compared to Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) at 10.94%. This indicates that RWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWT	LYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.39%	10.94%	+1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.42%	20.13%	+9.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.24%	29.18%	+11.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.03%	31.87%	+3.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.00%	36.47%	+12.53%

Financials

RWT vs. LYG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Redwood Trust, Inc. and Lloyds Banking Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RWT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Redwood Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 61.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LYG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 50.75B and revenue of 50.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

RWT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Redwood Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 61.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LYG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 1.98B and revenue of 50.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

RWT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Redwood Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 61.30M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

LYG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.27B and revenue of 50.75B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.