PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LADR vs. XHLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LADR and XHLF is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.0

Performance

LADR vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.69%
2.28%
LADR
XHLF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LADR:

1.18

XHLF:

12.13

Sortino Ratio

LADR:

1.71

XHLF:

37.68

Omega Ratio

LADR:

1.21

XHLF:

8.48

Calmar Ratio

LADR:

1.03

XHLF:

85.18

Martin Ratio

LADR:

5.56

XHLF:

474.93

Ulcer Index

LADR:

4.30%

XHLF:

0.01%

Daily Std Dev

LADR:

20.16%

XHLF:

0.42%

Max Drawdown

LADR:

-81.63%

XHLF:

-0.11%

Current Drawdown

LADR:

-7.13%

XHLF:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LADR achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly higher than XHLF's 0.47% return.


LADR

YTD

3.84%

1M

5.06%

6M

2.69%

1Y

17.12%

5Y*

-1.47%

10Y*

4.63%

XHLF

YTD

0.47%

1M

0.35%

6M

2.29%

1Y

4.98%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LADR vs. XHLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LADR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LADR is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LADR is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LADR is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LADR is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LADR is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LADR is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

XHLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XHLF is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XHLF is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XHLF is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XHLF is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XHLF is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XHLF is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LADR vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LADR, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.1812.13
The chart of Sortino ratio for LADR, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.7137.68
The chart of Omega ratio for LADR, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.218.48
The chart of Calmar ratio for LADR, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.1985.18
The chart of Martin ratio for LADR, currently valued at 5.56, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.56474.93
LADR
XHLF

The current LADR Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the XHLF Sharpe Ratio of 12.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LADR and XHLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.18
12.13
LADR
XHLF

Dividends

LADR vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison

LADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than XHLF's 4.84% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LADR
Ladder Capital Corp
7.92%8.22%7.99%8.76%6.67%9.61%7.54%9.92%8.91%10.52%17.85%
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.84%4.97%4.51%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LADR vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LADR drawdown since its inception was -81.63%, which is greater than XHLF's maximum drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LADR and XHLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-2.13%
0
LADR
XHLF

Volatility

LADR vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison

Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) at 0.11%. This indicates that LADR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.38%
0.11%
LADR
XHLF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab