LADR vs. XHLF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF).

XHLF is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2022.

Performance

LADR vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LADR vs. XHLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LADR Ladder Capital Corp	-8.98%	6.69%	5.53%	25.22%	-4.07%
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	0.77%	4.21%	5.04%	4.90%	0.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LADR achieves a -8.98% return, which is significantly lower than XHLF's 0.77% return.

LADR

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -3.53%
• YTD: -8.98%
• 6M: -6.40%
• 1Y: -6.67%
• 3Y*: 9.98%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 6.66%

XHLF

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: 4.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LADR vs. XHLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LADR

LADR Risk / Return Rank: 26
LADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
LADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
LADR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
LADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
LADR Martin Ratio Rank: 29

XHLF

XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LADR vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LADR	XHLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	12.10	-12.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	39.79	-40.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	9.68	-8.72
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.36	99.49	-99.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	604.66	-605.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LADR vs. XHLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LADR Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the XHLF Sharpe Ratio of 12.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LADR and XHLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LADR	XHLF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33	12.10	-12.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	10.73	-10.64

Correlation

The correlation between LADR and XHLF is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LADR vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison

LADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.42%, more than XHLF's 3.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LADR Ladder Capital Corp	9.42%	8.37%	8.22%	7.99%	8.76%	6.67%	9.61%	7.54%	9.92%	8.91%	9.37%	17.91%
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	3.92%	3.98%	4.96%	4.50%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LADR vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LADR drawdown since its inception was -81.63%, which is greater than XHLF's maximum drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LADR and XHLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LADR	XHLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.63%	-0.11%	-81.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.68%	-0.04%	-14.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.15%	0.00%	-13.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.44%	0.00%	-18.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.78%	0.01%	+6.77%

Volatility

LADR vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison

Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) at 0.09%. This indicates that LADR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LADR	XHLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	0.09%	+5.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.14%	0.21%	+13.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.46%	0.33%	+20.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.01%	0.42%	+24.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.28%	0.42%	+47.86%