LAC vs. XLE
LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) is a stock, while XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Over the past year, LAC returned -3.92% vs 36.53% for XLE. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAC vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a -32.57% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.29% return.
LAC
- 1D
- -5.47%
- 1M
- -33.93%
- 6M
- -49.91%
- YTD
- -32.57%
- 1Y
- -3.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 21.42%
- YTD
- 29.29%
- 1Y
- 36.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
LAC vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LAC Lithium Americas Corp. | -32.57% | 46.80% | -53.59% | -27.19% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.29% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -6.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAC and XLE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.14 |
The correlation between LAC and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAC vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
LAC
XLE
LAC vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAC | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.29 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.45 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 6.58 | -6.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAC vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAC | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.83% | -71.26% | -10.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.75% | -14.98% | -55.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.91% | -8.20% | -66.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.27% | -17.95% | -45.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.39% | 5.57% | +39.82% |
Volatility
LAC vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a higher volatility of 11.27% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 6.10%. This indicates that LAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAC | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.27% | 6.10% | +5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.46% | 16.65% | +34.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.28% | 20.96% | +111.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.31% | 25.87% | +74.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.31% | 29.58% | +70.73% |
Dividends
LAC vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAC Lithium Americas Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.66% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LAC and XLE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAC has higher volatility (11.27%) compared to XLE (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAC dropped -81.83% vs XLE's -71.26%.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAC and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer