PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAC vs. LYSDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAC vs. LYSDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a -29.82% return, which is significantly lower than LYSDY's 36.28% return.


LAC

1D
5.52%
1M
-29.98%
6M
-47.06%
YTD
-29.82%
1Y
-1.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-31.39%

LYSDY

1D
3.58%
1M
-9.84%
6M
8.57%
YTD
36.28%
1Y
68.97%
3Y*
35.70%
5Y*
18.96%
10Y*
68.94%
ALL TIME*
5.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAC vs. LYSDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
-29.82%46.80%-53.59%-27.19%
LYSDY
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR
36.28%109.37%-18.22%12.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and LYSDY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAC:

$683.23M

LYSDY:

$11.34B

EPS

LAC:

-$0.26

LYSDY:

A$0.13

PB Ratio

LAC:

0.80

LYSDY:

4.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAC:

$0.00

LYSDY:

A$1.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAC:

-$580.22K

LYSDY:

A$301.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAC:

-$52.10M

LYSDY:

A$236.57M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAC vs. LYSDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC
LAC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

LYSDY
LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAC vs. LYSDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LACLYSDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

1.49

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.04

2.98

-3.02

LAC vs. LYSDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the LYSDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and LYSDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAC vs. LYSDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, smaller than the maximum LYSDY drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and LYSDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LACLYSDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.83%

-99.93%

+18.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.14%

-46.39%

-24.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.89%

-59.24%

-14.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.32%

-84.31%

+20.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.03%

23.25%

+22.78%

Volatility

LAC vs. LYSDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) is 13.59%, while Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) has a volatility of 14.55%. This indicates that LAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYSDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LACLYSDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.59%

14.55%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.54%

42.81%

+8.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.95%

64.09%

+67.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.16%

50.67%

+49.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.16%

278.45%

-178.29%

Dividends

LAC vs. LYSDY - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAC nor LYSDY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LAC vs. LYSDY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Americas Corp. and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
406.10M
(LAC) Total Revenue
(LYSDY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LAC values in USD, LYSDY values in AUD

Frequently Asked Questions


LAC and LYSDY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYSDY has higher volatility (14.55%) compared to LAC (13.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAC dropped -81.83% vs LYSDY's -99.93%.

LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAC and LYSDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer