LYSDY vs. HBM

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM).

Performance

LYSDY vs. HBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LYSDY vs. HBM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR	66.09%	109.37%	-18.22%	-8.17%	-29.21%	144.41%	79.88%	50.87%	489.58%	258.76%
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc.	9.05%	145.46%	47.03%	9.24%	-29.87%	3.82%	69.50%	-11.77%	-46.20%	54.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LYSDY : $13.50B HBM : $8.66B
EPS LYSDY : $0.14 HBM : $1.43
PE Ratio LYSDY : 100.24 HBM : 15.08
PEG Ratio LYSDY : 15.43 HBM : 0.10
PS Ratio LYSDY : 11.08 HBM : 3.88
PB Ratio LYSDY : 4.02 HBM : 2.68
Total Revenue (TTM) LYSDY : $1.19B HBM : $2.22B
Gross Profit (TTM) LYSDY : $301.27M HBM : $719.02M
EBITDA (TTM) LYSDY : $236.57M HBM : $1.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYSDY achieves a 66.09% return, which is significantly higher than HBM's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LYSDY has outperformed HBM with an annualized return of 74.66%, while HBM has yielded a comparatively lower 20.75% annualized return.

LYSDY

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 66.09%
• 6M: 19.70%
• 1Y: 215.05%
• 3Y*: 45.60%
• 5Y*: 23.95%
• 10Y*: 74.66%

HBM

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -13.20%
• YTD: 9.05%
• 6M: 40.11%
• 1Y: 181.66%
• 3Y*: 60.66%
• 5Y*: 24.63%
• 10Y*: 20.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LYSDY vs. HBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYSDY

LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 91
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 87

HBM

HBM Risk / Return Rank: 94
HBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
HBM Omega Ratio Rank: 92
HBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
HBM Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYSDY vs. HBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYSDY	HBM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.25	3.23	+0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	3.36	-0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.45	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	5.01	-0.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.45	17.77	-8.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYSDY vs. HBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYSDY Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is comparable to the HBM Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYSDY and HBM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYSDY	HBM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25	3.23	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.45	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.35	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.18	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between LYSDY and HBM is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LYSDY vs. HBM - Dividend Comparison

LYSDY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc.	0.07%	0.07%	0.17%	0.31%	0.32%	0.22%	0.21%	0.36%	0.38%	0.23%	0.35%	0.52%

Drawdowns

LYSDY vs. HBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYSDY drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than HBM's maximum drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSDY and HBM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYSDY	HBM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.93%	-92.21%	-7.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.39%	-36.16%	-10.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.25%	-65.47%	+7.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.35%	-86.34%	+13.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.32%	-23.59%	-26.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.92%	-52.92%	-32.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.87%	10.20%	+11.67%

Volatility

LYSDY vs. HBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) is 18.22%, while Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) has a volatility of 20.97%. This indicates that LYSDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYSDY	HBM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.22%	20.97%	-2.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.16%	42.67%	+10.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.70%	56.58%	+10.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.32%	55.16%	-4.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	279.38%	59.46%	+219.92%

Financials

LYSDY vs. HBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR and Hudbay Minerals Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LYSDY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 114.53M and revenue of 406.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

HBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a gross profit of 245.92M and revenue of 737.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

LYSDY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 79.26M and revenue of 406.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

HBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported an operating income of 242.47M and revenue of 737.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.9%.

LYSDY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR reported a net income of 78.74M and revenue of 406.10M, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.

HBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a net income of 129.97M and revenue of 737.06M, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.