LYSDY vs. MP
LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR) and MP (MP Materials Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 5 years, LYSDY returned 13.89%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for MP. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LYSDY vs. MP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYSDY achieves a 21.64% return, which is significantly higher than MP's -18.29% return.
LYSDY
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -21.22%
- 6M
- -11.75%
- YTD
- 21.64%
- 1Y
- 42.29%
- 3Y*
- 32.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.89%
- 10Y*
- 66.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.67%
MP
- 1D
- -4.29%
- 1M
- -23.41%
- 6M
- -38.14%
- YTD
- -18.29%
- 1Y
- -35.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.20M | $3.05M | $3.26M | |
| $262.29M | $235.64M | $348.46M |
LYSDY vs. MP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR | 21.64% | 109.37% | -18.22% | -8.17% | -29.21% | 144.41% | 128.57% |
MP MP Materials Corp. | -18.29% | 223.85% | -21.41% | -18.25% | -46.54% | 41.19% | 224.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYSDY and MP is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2020 | 0.37 |
The correlation between LYSDY and MP shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LYSDY:
$10.13B
MP:
$7.35B
LYSDY:
A$0.13
MP:
-$0.57
LYSDY:
11.87
MP:
16.87
LYSDY:
A$1.19B
MP:
$305.30M
LYSDY:
A$301.27M
MP:
$25.30M
LYSDY:
A$236.57M
MP:
$1.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYSDY vs. MP — Risk / Return Rank
LYSDY
MP
LYSDY vs. MP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYSDY | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.96 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | -0.61 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.79 | -0.99 | +2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYSDY vs. MP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYSDY drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than MP's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSDY and MP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYSDY | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.93% | -81.99% | -17.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.39% | -58.16% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.39% | -58.16% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.25% | -81.99% | +23.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.62% | -58.16% | -5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.28% | -42.69% | -41.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.73% | 36.04% | -12.31% |
Volatility
LYSDY vs. MP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) is 13.69%, while MP Materials Corp. (MP) has a volatility of 16.63%. This indicates that LYSDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYSDY | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.69% | 16.63% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.11% | 49.97% | -7.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.20% | 73.95% | -9.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.48% | 69.84% | -19.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 278.35% | 72.38% | +205.97% |
Dividends
LYSDY vs. MP - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYSDY nor MP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LYSDY vs. MP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR and MP Materials Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LYSDY vs. MP - Profitability Comparison
LYSDY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 114.53M and revenue of 406.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.
MP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LYSDY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 79.26M and revenue of 406.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
MP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LYSDY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR reported a net income of 78.74M and revenue of 406.10M, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
MP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a net income of -7.97M and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYSDY and MP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MP has higher volatility (16.63%) compared to LYSDY (13.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYSDY dropped -99.93% vs MP's -81.99%.
LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LYSDY and MP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer