LABX vs. CIFG
LABX (Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LABX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.
Performance
LABX vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABX achieves a 236.94% return, which is significantly higher than CIFG's 18.50% return.
LABX
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- 13.48%
- 6M
- 260.99%
- YTD
- 236.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG
- 1D
- -9.74%
- 1M
- -12.32%
- 6M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LABX vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LABX Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF | 236.94% | -3.09% |
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 18.50% | -32.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABX and CIFG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABX vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LABX vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABX drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than CIFG's maximum drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABX and CIFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABX | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.93% | -71.71% | -19.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.24% | -46.00% | +15.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.77% | -35.72% | -17.05% |
Volatility
LABX vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABX | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.69% | 205.24% | -13.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.69% | 205.24% | -13.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.69% | 205.24% | -13.55% |
LABX vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABX vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LABX nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LABX and CIFG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LABX.
LABX and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LABX and 0.75% for CIFG.
Find the right allocation for LABX and CIFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer