LABX vs. LITX
LABX (Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LABX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.
Performance
LABX vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LABX
- 1D
- -19.74%
- 1M
- 51.81%
- YTD
- 233.71%
- 6M
- 223.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX
- 1D
- -14.44%
- 1M
- -29.57%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LABX vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LABX Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF | 260.82% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 246.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABX and LITX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABX vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LABX vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABX drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -51.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABX and LITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.93% | -51.46% | -39.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.74% | -45.05% | +25.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.44% | -17.11% | -37.33% |
Volatility
LABX vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.20% | 196.66% | -8.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.20% | 196.66% | -8.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 188.20% | 196.66% | -8.46% |
LABX vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABX vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
Neither LABX nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LABX and LITX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LABX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LABX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.
LABX and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LABX and 1.49% for LITX.
Find the right allocation for LABX and LITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer