LABX vs. LITX
LABX (Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LABX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.
Performance
LABX vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LABX
- 1D
- 22.88%
- 1M
- 181.79%
- YTD
- 189.84%
- 6M
- 262.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX
- 1D
- 27.08%
- 1M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LABX vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LABX Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF | 186.36% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 421.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABX and LITX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABX vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LABX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 60.22 | -59.83 |
Drawdowns
LABX vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABX drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -51.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABX and LITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.93% | -51.46% | -39.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -10.19% | +5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.88% | -14.34% | -43.54% |
Volatility
LABX vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 185.89% | 198.19% | -12.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 185.89% | 198.19% | -12.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 185.89% | 198.19% | -12.30% |
LABX vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABX vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
Neither LABX nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LABX and LITX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LABX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LABX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.
LABX and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LABX and 1.49% for LITX.
Find the right allocation for LABX and LITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer