PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABX vs. FUTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LABX vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABX achieves a 189.84% return, which is significantly higher than FUTG's -72.47% return.


LABX

1D
22.88%
1M
181.79%
YTD
189.84%
6M
262.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FUTG

1D
-1.50%
1M
-66.03%
YTD
-72.47%
6M
-74.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABX vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LABX
Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF
189.84%-10.85%
FUTG
Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF
-72.47%-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between LABX and FUTG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LABX vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LABX vs. FUTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LABXFUTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

-0.65

+1.04

Drawdowns

LABX vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABX drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than FUTG's maximum drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABX and FUTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LABXFUTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.93%

-86.19%

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.44%

-82.33%

+77.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.88%

-40.07%

-17.81%

Volatility

LABX vs. FUTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LABXFUTGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

185.89%

135.78%

+50.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

185.89%

135.78%

+50.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

185.89%

135.78%

+50.11%

LABX vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LABX vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither LABX nor FUTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LABX and FUTG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LABX.

LABX and FUTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LABX and 0.75% for FUTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LABX and FUTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer