PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KVYO vs. HUBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KVYO vs. HUBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Klaviyo Inc. (KVYO) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KVYO achieves a -60.39% return, which is significantly lower than HUBS's -56.94% return.


KVYO

1D
-2.94%
1M
-13.52%
YTD
-60.39%
6M
-61.33%
1Y
-59.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HUBS

1D
-1.83%
1M
-14.44%
YTD
-56.94%
6M
-56.91%
1Y
-67.67%
3Y*
-30.39%
5Y*
-21.80%
10Y*
14.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KVYO vs. HUBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KVYO
Klaviyo Inc.
-60.39%-21.27%48.45%-24.41%
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
-56.94%-42.41%20.02%13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between KVYO and HUBS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.56

The correlation between KVYO and HUBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KVYO:

$3.93B

HUBS:

$9.09B

EPS

KVYO:

-$0.03

HUBS:

$1.91

PS Ratio

KVYO:

2.94

HUBS:

2.76

PB Ratio

KVYO:

3.41

HUBS:

4.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

KVYO:

$1.31B

HUBS:

$3.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KVYO:

$978.26M

HUBS:

$2.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

KVYO:

-$28.45M

HUBS:

$196.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KVYO vs. HUBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KVYO
KVYO Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
KVYO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KVYO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
KVYO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
KVYO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KVYO Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

HUBS
HUBS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KVYO vs. HUBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Klaviyo Inc. (KVYO) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KVYOHUBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.76

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

-0.98

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.72

-1.64

-0.08

KVYO vs. HUBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KVYO Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is comparable to the HUBS Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KVYO and HUBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KVYO vs. HUBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KVYO drawdown since its inception was -73.86%, smaller than the maximum HUBS drawdown of -79.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVYO and HUBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KVYOHUBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.86%

-79.72%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.20%

-69.19%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.86%

-79.72%

+5.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.95%

-23.30%

-8.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.87%

41.38%

-6.51%

Volatility

KVYO vs. HUBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Klaviyo Inc. (KVYO) is 21.78%, while HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a volatility of 25.68%. This indicates that KVYO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KVYOHUBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.78%

25.68%

-3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.50%

54.74%

+7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.50%

63.11%

+5.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.21%

54.98%

+7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.21%

51.00%

+11.21%

Dividends

KVYO vs. HUBS - Dividend Comparison

Neither KVYO nor HUBS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

KVYO vs. HUBS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Klaviyo Inc. and HubSpot, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
358.01M
881.00M
(KVYO) Total Revenue
(HUBS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KVYO vs. HUBS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Klaviyo Inc. and HubSpot, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
75.1%
83.5%
Portfolio components
KVYO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Klaviyo Inc. reported a gross profit of 268.89M and revenue of 358.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.1%.

HUBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

KVYO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Klaviyo Inc. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 358.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

HUBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

KVYO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Klaviyo Inc. reported a net income of 9.04M and revenue of 358.01M, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.

HUBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KVYO and HUBS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUBS has higher volatility (25.68%) compared to KVYO (21.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KVYO dropped -73.86% vs HUBS's -79.72%.

KVYO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KVYO and HUBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer