PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KULR vs. SHIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KULR vs. SHIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly lower than SHIP's 69.69% return.


KULR

1D
-2.10%
1M
29.07%
YTD
26.01%
6M
-3.62%
1Y
-60.49%
3Y*
-11.82%
5Y*
-29.09%
10Y*

SHIP

1D
-0.26%
1M
-7.22%
YTD
69.69%
6M
52.26%
1Y
150.72%
3Y*
60.51%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
-42.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KULR vs. SHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
26.01%-89.58%1,818.92%-84.58%-56.52%87.76%-2.00%-42.31%73.33%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
69.69%38.48%-3.81%61.04%-36.53%70.83%-93.89%-92.71%-43.52%

Correlation

The correlation between KULR and SHIP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KULR:

$148.18M

SHIP:

$321.63M

EPS

KULR:

-$1.57

SHIP:

$1.00

PS Ratio

KULR:

9.11

SHIP:

2.01

PB Ratio

KULR:

1.22

SHIP:

1.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

KULR:

$16.17M

SHIP:

$158.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KULR:

$770.97K

SHIP:

$62.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

KULR:

-$60.59M

SHIP:

$78.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KULR vs. SHIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KULR
KULR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SHIP
SHIP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SHIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SHIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KULR vs. SHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KULRSHIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.50

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

8.17

-8.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.99

20.14

-21.14

KULR vs. SHIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KULR Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the SHIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KULR and SHIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KULRSHIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

3.57

-4.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.30

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

-0.10

-0.01

Drawdowns

KULR vs. SHIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SHIP drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and SHIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KULRSHIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.23%

-100.00%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.80%

-18.56%

-61.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.74%

-57.61%

-37.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.86%

-69.11%

-27.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.29%

-99.98%

+9.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.23%

-86.57%

+20.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.84%

7.51%

+53.33%

Volatility

KULR vs. SHIP - Volatility Comparison

KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 47.09% compared to Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) at 15.48%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KULRSHIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.09%

15.48%

+31.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.46%

33.66%

+42.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

106.05%

42.56%

+63.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

126.05%

52.08%

+73.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

126.51%

98.57%

+27.94%

Dividends

KULR vs. SHIP - Dividend Comparison

KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
2.79%3.58%10.58%1.28%25.23%

Financials

KULR vs. SHIP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KULR Technology Group, Inc. and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
2.86M
49.42M
(KULR) Total Revenue
(SHIP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KULR and SHIP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KULR has higher volatility (47.09%) compared to SHIP (15.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs SHIP's -100.00%.

SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KULR and SHIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer