KULR vs. RYCEY
KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) and RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) are both stocks. KULR operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while RYCEY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, KULR returned -30.52%/yr vs 68.92%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KULR vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a -6.76% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 15.83% return.
KULR
- 1D
- 4.94%
- 1M
- -30.30%
- 6M
- -33.97%
- YTD
- -6.76%
- 1Y
- -60.00%
- 3Y*
- -29.83%
- 5Y*
- -30.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.48%
RYCEY
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 111.25%
- 5Y*
- 68.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.47%
KULR vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | -6.76% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -56.52% | 87.76% | -2.00% | -42.31% | 136.36% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 15.83% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -12.69% | -20.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between KULR and RYCEY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, KULR and RYCEY have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
KULR:
$127.67M
RYCEY:
$150.95B
KULR:
-$1.53
RYCEY:
£0.99
KULR:
6.90
RYCEY:
2.83
KULR:
0.90
RYCEY:
41.62
KULR:
$16.17M
RYCEY:
£40.04B
KULR:
$770.97K
RYCEY:
£10.10B
KULR:
-$60.59M
RYCEY:
£8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KULR vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank
KULR
RYCEY
KULR vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KULR | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.18 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 1.56 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 4.32 | -5.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KULR vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and RYCEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KULR | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.23% | -99.07% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.06% | -21.75% | -49.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.74% | -23.37% | -71.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.86% | -62.01% | -34.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.81% | -77.01% | -15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.54% | -84.09% | +17.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.07% | 7.83% | +41.24% |
Volatility
KULR vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 27.42% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 8.23%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KULR | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.42% | 8.23% | +19.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.15% | 33.05% | +42.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.43% | 38.40% | +60.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.48% | 43.23% | +83.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 126.74% | 49.27% | +77.47% |
Dividends
KULR vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison
KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
Financials
KULR vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KULR Technology Group, Inc. and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
KULR and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (27.42%) compared to RYCEY (8.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.
RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KULR and RYCEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer