KULR vs. FHLC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock, while FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. Over the past 5 years, KULR returned -31.86%/yr vs 5.58%/yr for FHLC. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KULR vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly lower than FHLC's 6.56% return.

KULR

• 1D: -9.03%
• 1M: -28.61%
• 6M: -34.17%
• YTD: -11.49%
• 1Y: -58.87%
• 3Y*: -29.10%
• 5Y*: -31.86%
• 10Y*: —

FHLC

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: 6.95%
• 6M: 5.10%
• YTD: 6.56%
• 1Y: 25.09%
• 3Y*: 9.47%
• 5Y*: 5.58%
• 10Y*: 9.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KULR vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	-11.49%	-89.58%	1,818.92%	-84.58%	-56.52%	87.76%	-2.00%	-42.31%	136.36%
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	6.56%	15.42%	2.48%	2.58%	-5.55%	20.39%	18.13%	21.94%	-3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between KULR and FHLC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018	0.10

Return for Risk

KULR vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KULR

KULR Risk / Return Rank: 17
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 21
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FHLC

FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 59
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KULR vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KULR	FHLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.60	1.64	-2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.64	2.55	-3.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.29	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	2.43	-3.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	6.00	-7.21

KULR vs. FHLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KULR Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KULR and FHLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KULR vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and FHLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	KULR	FHLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.23%	-28.76%	-68.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.06%	-10.38%	-60.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-94.74%	-16.87%	-77.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.86%	-17.73%	-79.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.18%	-1.92%	-91.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.52%	-5.17%	-61.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.77%	4.19%	+44.58%

Volatility

KULR vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 27.96% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 5.85%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KULR	FHLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.96%	5.85%	+22.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.75%	11.52%	+65.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.45%	15.37%	+83.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.50%	15.21%	+111.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	126.80%	16.86%	+109.94%

Dividends

KULR vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	1.30%	1.40%	1.51%	1.40%	1.30%	1.16%	1.45%	1.18%	1.38%	1.38%	1.40%	2.07%
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KULR and FHLC in my portfolio?

KULR and FHLC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KULR or FHLC?

KULR has higher volatility (27.96%) compared to FHLC (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs FHLC's -28.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.