KRBN vs. KURE

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

KRBN (KraneShares Global Carbon ETF) and KURE (KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KRBN is a Commodities fund tracking the IHS Markit Global Carbon Index, while KURE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KRBN returned 6.02%/yr vs -16.49%/yr for KURE. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KRBN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for KURE.

Performance

KRBN vs. KURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRBN achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly higher than KURE's -11.50% return.

KRBN

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 3.74%
• YTD: -5.40%
• 6M: -5.66%
• 1Y: 11.15%
• 3Y*: 0.52%
• 5Y*: 6.02%
• 10Y*: —

KURE

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -6.16%
• YTD: -11.50%
• 6M: -14.51%
• 1Y: -6.43%
• 3Y*: -3.58%
• 5Y*: -16.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRBN vs. KURE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF	-5.40%	23.11%	-13.56%	8.01%	-12.75%	107.69%	25.03%
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF	-11.50%	24.87%	-17.83%	-17.70%	-25.43%	-16.01%	11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between KRBN and KURE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020	0.07

Return for Risk

KRBN vs. KURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRBN

KRBN Risk / Return Rank: 16
KRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
KRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
KRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 18
KRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
KRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 14

KURE

KURE Risk / Return Rank: 7
KURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
KURE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
KURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KURE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRBN vs. KURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KRBN	KURE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	-0.25	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	-0.17	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.98	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	-0.21	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	-0.44	+1.58

KRBN vs. KURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRBN Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the KURE Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRBN and KURE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KRBN vs. KURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRBN drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, smaller than the maximum KURE drawdown of -68.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRBN and KURE.

Drawdown Indicators

	KRBN	KURE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.42%	-68.53%	+32.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.98%	-30.88%	+5.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.34%	-34.05%	+6.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.42%	-67.94%	+31.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.76%	-61.46%	+47.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.12%	-38.20%	+22.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.79%	14.64%	-4.85%

Volatility

KRBN vs. KURE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) is 5.28%, while KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that KRBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KRBN	KURE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.28%	7.68%	-2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.89%	18.20%	-1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	26.23%	-7.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.06%	31.86%	-3.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.55%	32.34%	-3.79%

KRBN vs. KURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRBN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KURE's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

KRBN vs. KURE - Dividend Comparison

KRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than KURE's 4.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF	2.01%	1.90%	7.10%	7.60%	22.91%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF	4.74%	4.19%	1.29%	0.65%	0.05%	14.12%	0.00%	0.25%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KRBN and KURE in my portfolio?

KRBN and KURE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KRBN or KURE?

KURE has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to KRBN (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRBN dropped -36.42% vs KURE's -68.53%.

Which ETF is better, KRBN or KURE?

On 5-year performance, KRBN leads with 6.02% vs -16.49% for KURE. On fees, KURE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, KRBN has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KRBN or KURE?

Over the 5-year period, KRBN has performed better with a 6.02% return vs -16.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KRBN or KURE?

KURE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KRBN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KRBN or KURE?

KURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 2.01% for KRBN.

What is the main difference between KRBN and KURE?

KRBN is categorized as Commodities, while KURE is China Equities. KRBN tracks IHS Markit Global Carbon Index, while KURE tracks MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KRBN and 0.65% for KURE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KRBN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.